Posts

#4637 Prompt Models

#4637 Prompt Models #4637  Now that we have general purpose LLMs, would it make sense to train a model on prompting? Short answer: Yes, absolutely—and we already do, though usually under different names. Training or fine-tuning models specifically to craft, refine, optimizer, or meta-prompt other models isn't just a hypothetical; it’s a central paradigm in modern AI architecture and prompt optimization workflows. Here is how training models on prompting works in practice, why it makes sense, and where it hits its theoretical limits: How "Prompt Models" Are Trained Today When people talk about training a model on prompting, it usually falls into three distinct architectures: 1. Automatic Prompt Engineers (APEs) & Meta-Prompting Instead of humans spending hours manually tweaking wording, system instructions, or few-shot examples, you train or fine-tune a model whose sole input is a task objective + evaluation metric and whose output is the optimized prompt . Reinforcem...

#4636 Moonshot AI Projects; +First Principles to Design the First Computer

#4636 Moonshot AI Projects; +First Principles to Design the First Computer Y Combinator: Jeff Dean: The 1% Rule for Building in AI https://youtu.be/CxXgV54KzpQ AI Is Improving Faster Than Ever | MOONSHOTS https://youtu.be/-LzH932gIJo #4636  Moonshot AI projects Depending on the context, "Moonshot AI" usually refers to either the prominent Beijing-based AI research lab (creators of Kimi ), the open-source Project Moonshot evaluation toolkit, or the concept of high-risk, high-reward "moonshot" initiatives in artificial intelligence. Here is a breakdown of the primary projects associated with each: 1. Moonshot AI (The Frontier AI Research Lab) Founded by Yang Zhilin, Beijing-based Moonshot AI is one of China's primary "AI Tigers," known for pushing the boundaries of ultra-long context windows, multimodal agentic systems, and custom model architectures. Core Models & Architectures Kimi K3: A 2.8-trillion parameter open model featuring a 1-million-t...

#4635 Critique Agent Update to Other AI Agent System Instructions

#4635 Critique Agent Update to Other AI Agent System Instructions #4635  Given that AI Agents have system instructions, can a follow-up critical agent suggest changes to the previous agent's instructions in an attempt to improve its response? Yes, absolutely. In multi-agent orchestration architectures, having an Evaluator/Critic Agent dynamically modify or refine the System Instructions (Prompts) of a Worker/Generator Agent is a core design pattern for iterative improvement. This approach goes beyond simple output feedback (e.g., "Rewrite this to be shorter" ) by addressing the root cause of an inadequate output: the operational framing and rules governing the generating agent. Here is how this dynamic works in practice, along with key design considerations: 1. The Meta-Prompting / Prompt Optimization Loop Rather than having the Critic directly fix the Generator's final response, the workflow operates in a meta-feedback loop: Generation: Agent A (Worker) receives...