#3094 Google Gemini 2.0 Flash: Dumping the Contents of an LLM to Learn its Workings and Capabilities

China's "Weaponized" Open Source AI and US Tech Collapse...

#3094 Following the release of a new LLM, how can an engineer "dump the contents of" the LLM to learn its inner workings and capabilities?

Comprehensive Methodologies for Investigating the Inner Workings and Capabilities of Novel Large Language Models

1. Introduction: The Imperative of Understanding New LLMs

The rapid evolution and increasing deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitate thorough and systematic investigation to comprehend their capabilities, limitations, and underlying mechanisms. A mere superficial interaction with these advanced artificial intelligence systems is insufficient for researchers aiming to contribute meaningfully to the field. A comprehensive analysis, employing a multitude of techniques, is crucial to uncover the true potential and inherent pitfalls of these models. This report outlines a multi-faceted approach for researchers to effectively analyze a newly released LLM, focusing on both direct engagement and advanced analytical techniques, drawing upon established best practices and contemporary research in LLM evaluation.

2. Laying the Groundwork: Initial Information Gathering

2.1. Leveraging Developer Resources: Official Documentation, Research Papers, and Blog Posts
The initial and foundational step in understanding a novel LLM involves a meticulous examination of all publicly accessible materials provided by its developers. This includes a detailed study of the official documentation, which offers crucial insights into the model's intended architecture, functionalities, and recommended usage protocols. Research papers released by the development team provide a deeper, often technical, understanding of the model's design, the datasets used for its training, the methodologies employed, and the performance benchmarks achieved 1. Furthermore, blog posts associated with the release can offer high-level explanations of key features, illustrative use case scenarios, and announcements regarding new functionalities or capabilities, providing a broader context for the model's introduction to the research and development community.
2.2. Exploring the Interface: Publicly Available APIs and Usage Guidelines
Upon the release of a new LLM, developers frequently provide publicly accessible Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) or user-friendly interfaces that enable researchers to interact with the model programmatically or through a graphical interface. A thorough understanding of the available API endpoints, the parameters that govern the model's behavior, and the expected data formats for both input and output is paramount for conducting systematic testing. Researchers should familiarize themselves with common API parameters such as temperature, which influences the randomness of the model's responses, top_p, which controls the diversity of the generated text, max_tokens, which sets the length limit for the output, and various penalty parameters that affect token repetition 3. Additionally, careful attention should be paid to the API's rate limits and usage guidelines to ensure sustainable and efficient interaction with the service, preventing disruptions due to excessive requests 4.

3. Direct Interaction and Output Analysis: Unveiling Capabilities

3.1. The Art of Prompt Engineering: Crafting Diverse Input Sets
To effectively elicit a comprehensive range of responses from the LLM, researchers must formulate a diverse set of input prompts that span various topics, levels of complexity, and stylistic variations. Employing established prompt engineering techniques is essential to guide the model and explore different facets of its abilities 5. Zero-shot prompting involves instructing the model to perform a task without providing any specific examples, thereby testing its inherent understanding and general knowledge. Few-shot prompting enhances the model's learning by including a small number of examples within the prompt to guide it towards the desired output format or task completion. Chain-of-thought prompting encourages the model to explicitly show its reasoning process in a step-by-step manner before arriving at a final answer, aiding in the analysis of its problem-solving capabilities. More advanced techniques such as meta-prompting, where one LLM is used to create or refine prompts for another, can also be employed for sophisticated analysis 7. Furthermore, self-ask prompting encourages the LLM to break down complex questions into a series of simpler, self-generated sub-questions, offering insights into its decompositional reasoning 9.
3.2. Testing the Boundaries: Responses to Ambiguous, Contradictory, and Nonsensical Prompts
Investigating the LLM's responses to prompts that are intentionally ambiguous, contradictory, or even nonsensical is crucial for understanding its robustness and error handling capabilities. Researchers should observe how the model reacts to inputs that lack clear instructions or contain conflicting information. Analyzing whether the model attempts to seek clarification, provides a reasonable interpretation despite the flawed input, or generates outputs that reflect the nonsensical nature of the prompt can reveal valuable information about its limitations in logical reasoning and its capacity to handle uncertainty.
3.3. Task-Specific Evaluation: Assessing Performance Across Applications (Summarization, Translation, QA, Creative Writing)
A systematic evaluation of the LLM's ability to perform specific natural language processing tasks is vital for a comprehensive understanding of its capabilities. Researchers should test the model on tasks such as summarization, translation, question answering, and creative writing, meticulously evaluating the quality of its output for each. For each task, it is important to define clear evaluation criteria and utilize relevant metrics 11. For summarization, metrics like ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) can be used to compare the generated summaries against human-authored reference summaries. In translation tasks, the BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) score is a common metric for assessing the quality of the machine-translated text against professional human translations. For question answering, accuracy can be evaluated using metrics such as Exact Match (EM) and F1 score, often employing benchmark datasets like SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset). Evaluating creative writing is more subjective but can involve human evaluation based on criteria such as coherence, fluency, originality, and the ability to adhere to specific stylistic requirements.

4. Identifying Limitations and Biases: Probing the Model's Underbelly

4.1. Eliciting Biases and Revealing Knowledge Limitations
Analyzing the LLM's behavior when presented with prompts specifically designed to elicit biases or expose limitations in its knowledge and reasoning is essential for a thorough understanding. Researchers can utilize established bias benchmark datasets to systematically test for various types of biases, including those related to gender, race, and culture 13. Probing the model's knowledge boundaries can be achieved through the use of semi-open-ended questions, where the analysis of the model's responses and its confidence levels can reveal the extent and depth of its knowledge 15. Furthermore, testing the LLM's reasoning abilities with logical puzzles, complex problem-solving scenarios, and dedicated reasoning evaluation benchmarks can highlight its strengths and weaknesses in these critical areas 17.
4.2. Robustness Testing: Understanding Sensitivity to Adversarial Prompts
Investigating the LLM's behavior when confronted with prompts specifically crafted to mislead it or induce the generation of unintended outputs is crucial for assessing its robustness. Researchers should employ adversarial prompting techniques to test the model's resilience to manipulation and its ability to maintain its intended functionality under duress 19. Observing how the model reacts to subtle alterations in the input or attempts to circumvent its safety mechanisms can provide valuable insights into its security. Utilizing established robustness testing frameworks and metrics can further aid in quantifying the model's resistance to various forms of adversarial attacks 21.

5. Contextualizing Performance: Comparative and Community Analysis

5.1. Benchmarking Against Existing Models: Quantitative Performance Evaluation
To effectively contextualize the performance of a new LLM, researchers should compare it against existing, well-established models using standard benchmark datasets that are relevant to its intended applications. Consulting LLM benchmark leaderboards can provide an overview of the new model's relative standing within the broader landscape of language models 23. The selection of appropriate benchmarks should align with the specific capabilities and limitations being investigated. For instance, the MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) benchmark is suitable for evaluating general knowledge, HumanEval is designed for assessing code generation abilities, and TruthfulQA is specifically aimed at measuring the model's truthfulness 25.
5.2. The Wisdom of the Crowd: Leveraging Community-Driven Analyses and Discussions
Seeking out and analyzing community-driven evaluations, analyses, and discussions about the new LLM on various platforms such as research forums, social media, and technical blogs can provide a broader and often more practical understanding of the model's behavior and real-world implications 27. Engaging with the wider research community to gather insights, diverse perspectives, and findings from other researchers who are also in the process of analyzing the model can be invaluable. Paying close attention to community discussions surrounding the model's observed strengths, identified weaknesses, potential biases, and any discovered vulnerabilities can significantly enhance a researcher's understanding.

6. Advanced Methodologies for In-Depth Analysis

6.1. Quantitative Evaluation: Exploring LLM Evaluation Metrics
Employing a diverse range of quantitative evaluation metrics allows for an objective assessment of different facets of the LLM's output 29. Perplexity serves as a measure of the model's uncertainty in predicting the subsequent token in a sequence, offering insights into the fluency and coherence of the generated text 31. For tasks such as summarization and translation, ROUGE and BLEU scores, respectively, quantify the overlap between the LLM's output and human-generated reference texts 33. Furthermore, utilizing task-specific metrics that are tailored to the particular application being evaluated, such as accuracy for question answering or the F1 score for classification tasks, can provide granular performance insights.
6.2. Qualitative Assessment: The Role of Human Evaluation and LLM-as-a-Judge Techniques
Incorporating human evaluation into the analysis process is crucial for assessing subjective aspects of the LLM's output that quantitative metrics may overlook. Human evaluators can provide valuable insights into the coherence, relevance, creativity, and ethical considerations of the generated text 29. Additionally, researchers can explore the use of LLM-as-a-Judge techniques, where a highly capable LLM is employed to evaluate the outputs of the new LLM based on a set of predefined criteria 29. Following best practices for LLM-as-a-Judge, such as employing binary or low-precision scoring for increased reliability, clearly defining the meaning of each score, and breaking down complex evaluation criteria into smaller, more manageable components, is recommended 37. Efforts can also be made to align LLM judges with human evaluators by incorporating human feedback and training data to improve the consistency and accuracy of the automated evaluations 39.
6.3. Delving into the Probabilities: Analyzing Token Probabilities for Error Detection
Investigating the probability scores associated with each token generated by the LLM can offer a deeper understanding of its confidence levels and potential sources of error 41. Analyzing metrics such as the maximum probability assigned to any token, the probability margin between the highest and second-highest scoring tokens, and the prediction entropy can serve as indicators of the model's certainty. Researchers can leverage these probability scores to identify responses that exhibit low confidence, potentially highlighting areas where the model might be generating inaccurate or hallucinated content, thus requiring further human review.

7. Navigating the Challenges and Ethical Considerations

7.1. The Importance of Transparency and Documenting Findings
Maintaining a transparent and meticulously documented process throughout the entire analysis is paramount. This includes comprehensive records of the prompts used, the corresponding responses received from the LLM, the specific evaluation methods applied, and all the findings obtained 35. Transparency is not only crucial for ensuring the reproducibility of the research but also for enabling other researchers in the field to build upon the analysis and verify the results. Furthermore, it is important to document any observed limitations in the LLM's own documentation or any lack of transparency regarding the specifics of its training data and underlying architecture 44.
7.2. Addressing and Mitigating Bias in LLM Analysis
Researchers must maintain a critical awareness of potential biases that might inadvertently influence their analysis, both in the design of the prompts used to interact with the LLM and in the interpretation of the resulting data. Actively seeking to mitigate any potential biases in the evaluation process is essential to ensure a fair and objective assessment of the LLM's capabilities and limitations 46. It is also important to acknowledge the inherent challenges and limitations associated with current techniques aimed at removing bias from LLMs 50.
7.3. Understanding the Boundaries of Knowledge and Reasoning
It is crucial to acknowledge the inherent limitations of current LLMs in terms of possessing true understanding and exhibiting genuine reasoning capabilities 17. Researchers should recognize that these models primarily operate based on patterns learned from vast amounts of data and may not possess the same level of cognitive ability as humans. Furthermore, it is important to consider the limitations of existing benchmark datasets in fully capturing the complexities of knowledge and reasoning required for various real-world tasks 25.

8. Conclusion: Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of LLMs

Analyzing a new LLM demands a systematic and multifaceted approach that integrates initial information gathering, direct interaction, advanced analytical methodologies, and a critical awareness of ethical considerations and inherent limitations. By diligently leveraging developer-provided resources, employing effective prompt engineering techniques, utilizing relevant evaluation metrics and benchmarks, and actively engaging with the broader research community, researchers can achieve a comprehensive understanding of the LLM's inner workings and overall capabilities. This in-depth analysis will contribute valuable insights to the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence, ultimately fostering the responsible development and deployment of these powerful language models.

Table 1: Key LLM Evaluation Metrics and Their Applications

Metric Category	Metric	Description	Application in LLM Analysis
Fluency & Coherence	Perplexity	Measures uncertainty in predicting the next token.	Assessing the natural flow and readability of text generated by the LLM.
	Coherence	Analyzes the logical flow and consistency of the generated text.	Evaluating the overall structure and logical progression of ideas in the LLM's output.
Accuracy & Relevance	ROUGE	Compares an LLM's output with a set of reference summaries.	Evaluating content relevance and alignment with user input, particularly for summarization tasks.
	BLEU	Evaluates machine translation quality by comparing model outputs to references.	Assessing the accuracy and fluency of the LLM in translation tasks.
	Exact Match	Measures the percentage of answers that exactly match the reference answers.	Evaluating the accuracy of the LLM in question answering tasks where a precise answer is expected.
	F1 Score	Harmonic mean of precision and recall.	Assessing the balanced accuracy of the LLM in classification and question answering tasks.
Bias & Fairness	Disparity Analysis	Identifying and mitigating biases within model responses.	Detecting and quantifying biases related to different demographic groups in the LLM's output.
	Demographic Parity	Measures if model's performance is consistent across demographic groups.	Evaluating whether the LLM's predictions or responses are biased towards any particular group.
Error Detection	Token Probability Analysis	Analyzes the probability scores assigned to each generated token.	Identifying potential errors or hallucinations by examining the model's confidence in its output.
	Hallucination Index	Measures the frequency and severity of fabricated content.	Assessing the LLM's tendency to generate factually incorrect or illogical statements.
Human Evaluation	Likert Scale	Humans rate output based on criteria like coherence, relevance, fluency.	Gaining subjective insights into the quality of the LLM's output from a human perspective.
	Preference Judgements	Humans compare outputs of different models or variations.	Providing a relative ranking of the new LLM's performance against existing models or different configurations.
Efficiency	Response Time	How quickly the LLM generates responses.	Evaluating the speed and efficiency of the LLM, particularly important for real-time applications.
Robustness	Adversarial Testing	Tests the model's ability to withstand manipulative inputs.	Understanding the LLM's resilience to prompts designed to elicit harmful or unintended outputs.
Custom Evaluation	LLM-as-a-Judge	Uses a strong LLM to evaluate the outputs of another LLM.	Automating aspects of qualitative evaluation by leveraging the analytical capabilities of AI. Can be tailored to specific criteria relevant to the research.

Works cited

New LLM developed for under $50 outperforms OpenAI's o1-preview - SiliconANGLE, accessed March 29, 2025, https://siliconangle.com/2025/02/06/new-llm-developed-50-outperforms-openais-o1-preview/
Tracing the thoughts of a large language model - Anthropic, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.anthropic.com/research/tracing-thoughts-language-model
Academy - Article - LLM AI Parameters - AI/ML API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aimlapi.com/academy-articles/llm-api-parameters
Rate limits - OpenAI API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/rate-limits
Prompt Engineering Techniques: Top 5 for 2025 - K2view, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.k2view.com/blog/prompt-engineering-techniques/
12 Prompt Engineering Techniques - Cobus Greyling - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cobusgreyling.medium.com/12-prompt-engineering-techniques-644481c857aa
Use Meta-Prompting - Helicone OSS LLM Observability, accessed March 29, 2025, https://docs.helicone.ai/guides/prompt-engineering/use-meta-prompting
Meta Prompts - Because Your LLM Can Do Better Than Hello World : r/LocalLLaMA - Reddit, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i2b2eo/meta_prompts_because_your_llm_can_do_better_than/
Self-Ask Prompting: Improving LLM Reasoning with Step-by-Step Question Breakdown - Learn Prompting, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/advanced/few_shot/self_ask
12 Prompt Engineering Techniques - HumanFirst, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.humanfirst.ai/blog/12-prompt-engineering-techniques
How to Evaluate LLM Summarization | by Isaac Tham | TDS Archive - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/data-science/how-to-evaluate-llm-summarization-18a040c3905d
MLflow LLM Evaluation, accessed March 29, 2025, https://mlflow.org/docs/latest/llms/llm-evaluate/index.html
Assessing Biases in LLMs: From Basic Tasks to Hiring Decisions - Holistic AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.holisticai.com/blog/assessing-biases-in-llms
i-gallegos/Fair-LLM-Benchmark - GitHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://github.com/i-gallegos/Fair-LLM-Benchmark
Perception of Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models through Semi-open-ended Question Answering | PromptLayer, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.promptlayer.com/research-papers/perception-of-knowledge-boundary-for-large-language-models-through-semi-open-ended-question-answering
Probing the Decision Boundaries of In-context Learning in Large Language Models - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2406.11233v1
Understanding LLMs' Reasoning Limits Today: Insights to Shape ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@parserdigital/understanding-llms-reasoning-limits-today-insights-to-shape-your-future-strategy-fc1c27c9e904
What Are the Limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)? - PromptDrive.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://promptdrive.ai/llm-limitations/
Adversarial Prompts in LLMs - A Comprehensive Guide - ADaSci, accessed March 29, 2025, https://adasci.org/adversarial-prompts-in-llms-a-comprehensive-guide/
Adversarial Attacks on LLMs - Lil'Log, accessed March 29, 2025, https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-10-25-adv-attack-llm/
Robustness Testing: The Essential Guide | Nightfall AI Security 101, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.nightfall.ai/ai-security-101/robustness-testing
Responsible AI: The Importance of Robustness in Large Language Models (LLMs) - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@sulbha.jindal/responsible-ai-the-importance-of-robustness-in-large-language-models-llms-671a5c3718ec
2024 LLM Leaderboard: compare Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://klu.ai/llm-leaderboard
LLM Leaderboards - LLM Explorer - EXTRACTUM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://llm.extractum.io/static/llm-leaderboards/
20 LLM evaluation benchmarks and how they work - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-benchmarks
An Introduction to LLM Benchmarking - Confident AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.confident-ai.com/blog/the-current-state-of-benchmarking-llms
LLM Research Forum - Quantopian, accessed March 29, 2025, https://community.quantopian.com/c/llm-research-forum
[D] What are the best sites/blogs to keep up with LLMs? : r/MachineLearning - Reddit, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/16am3uz/d_what_are_the_best_sitesblogs_to_keep_up_with/
LLM Evaluation: Key Metrics, Best Practices and Frameworks - Aisera, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aisera.com/blog/llm-evaluation/
LLM evaluation metrics and methods - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-evaluation-metrics
Perplexity: How to calculate perplexity to evaluate the confidence of ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://docs.kolena.com/metrics/perplexity/
[perplexity calculation] Text perplexity calculation #llm - GitHub Gist, accessed March 29, 2025, https://gist.github.com/izikeros/e97a9d3359f3872b5e74cb36380c46ae
Unveiling the Power of ROUGE Metrics in NLP | by Yajna Bopaiah | AI Mind, accessed March 29, 2025, https://pub.aimind.so/unveiling-the-power-of-rouge-metrics-in-nlp-b6d3f96d3363
Understanding MT Quality: BLEU Scores - ModernMT Blog, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.modernmt.com/understanding-mt-quality-bleu-scores/
LLM Evaluation: Metrics, Methodologies, Best Practices - DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/llm-evaluation
LLM Evaluation: Key Metrics, Methods, Challenges, and Best Practices - Openxcell, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.openxcell.com/blog/llm-evaluation/
LLM-as-a-judge: a complete guide to using LLMs for evaluations - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-as-a-judge
LLM Evaluation: Everything You Need To Run, Benchmark LLM Evals - Arize AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arize.com/blog-course/llm-evaluation-the-definitive-guide/
Aligning LLM as judge with human evaluators - Blog, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.ragas.io/aligning-llm-as-judge-with-human-evaluators
View of Measuring Human-AI Value Alignment in Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AIES/article/view/31703/33870
LLM Evaluation: Comparing Four Methods to Automatically Detect ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://labelstud.io/blog/llm-evaluation-comparing-four-methods-to-automatically-detect-errors/
Detecting Errors through Ensembling Prompts (DEEP): An End-to-End LLM Framework for Detecting Factual Errors - ACL Anthology, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.728.pdf
[D] Confidence * may be * all you need. : r/MachineLearning - Reddit, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/198y67i/d_confidence_may_be_all_you_need/
Seven limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in recruitment technology - Textkernel, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.textkernel.com/learn-support/blog/seven-limitations-of-llms-in-hr-tech/
Using Transparency to Handle LLMs Bias | by Devansh - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://machine-learning-made-simple.medium.com/using-transparency-to-handle-llms-bias-d5b992df8f07
Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2411.10915v1
How to mitigate bias in LLMs (Large Language Models) - Hello Future, accessed March 29, 2025, https://hellofuture.orange.com/en/how-to-avoid-replicating-bias-and-human-error-in-llms/
A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384363990_A_Comprehensive_Survey_of_Bias_in_LLMs_Current_Landscape_and_Future_Directions
LLM Bias: Understanding, Mitigating and Testing the Bias in Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://academy.test.io/en/articles/9227500-llm-bias-understanding-mitigating-and-testing-the-bias-in-large-language-models
EditBias: Debiasing Stereotyped Language Models via Model Editing - OpenReview, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=_l6GYAi8fwl
Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detection - NSF-PAR, accessed March 29, 2025, https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10309653
How can biases in LLMs be mitigated? - Milvus, accessed March 29, 2025, https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/how-can-biases-in-llms-be-mitigated
Understanding LLMs and overcoming their limitations - Lumenalta, accessed March 29, 2025, https://lumenalta.com/insights/understanding-llms-overcoming-limitations
Limitations of LLMs: Bias, Hallucinations, and More - Learn Prompting, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/basics/pitfalls
Testing the cognitive limits of large language models - Bank for International Settlements, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull83.htm
LLM Benchmarking: Understanding the Landscape and Limitations, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.novusasi.com/blog/llm-benchmarking-understanding-the-landscape-and-limitations
LLM Benchmarking for Business Success - Teradata, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.teradata.com/insights/ai-and-machine-learning/llm-benchmarking-business-success
LLMs Evaluation: Benchmarks, Challenges, and Future Trends - Prem AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.premai.io/llms-evaluation-benchmarks-challenges-and-future-trends/

Provide prompts that I can submit to the LLM to "dump its contents" to learn its inner workings and capabilities

Decoding the Intelligence: A Comprehensive Analysis of Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative force in the landscape of artificial intelligence, demonstrating remarkable proficiency in understanding, processing, and generating human-like text 1. Their capabilities extend across a diverse range of applications, from powering sophisticated chatbots and virtual assistants to aiding in complex tasks within healthcare, finance, education, and law 3. These models, built upon deep learning architectures, have captured the attention of researchers, industry professionals, and the general public alike due to their capacity to handle intricate natural language tasks with increasing accuracy and coherence.

This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of large language models, delving into their core functionalities, the types of tasks they are designed to handle, their mechanisms for knowledge acquisition and representation, the processes underlying their reasoning abilities, the safety protocols governing their behavior, their inherent limitations and potential biases, and the methodologies employed for their evaluation. By examining these critical aspects, this report seeks to offer a detailed and technically accurate overview of the current state of LLMs, drawing upon existing research and established best practices in the field. The structure of this report will encompass an introduction to the transformative impact of LLMs, a detailed exploration of their core functionalities and task handling abilities, an examination of their knowledge acquisition and representation mechanisms, an analysis of their reasoning and information processing capabilities, a discussion of their safety protocols and ethical considerations, an overview of their inherent limitations and biases, and finally, a review of the methods used for their evaluation and the importance of transparency in their development and deployment.

Core Functionalities and Task Handling

Large language models possess a suite of core functionalities that enable them to interact with and manipulate textual data in sophisticated ways. These functionalities underpin their ability to handle a wide array of tasks across various domains.

Text Generation and Manipulation

At their core, LLMs are designed to generate coherent and contextually relevant text based on input prompts 4. This fundamental capability is harnessed through various prompt engineering techniques that guide the model to produce desired outputs. Zero-shot prompting involves instructing the model to perform a task without providing any specific examples 12. Few-shot prompting, on the other hand, provides the model with a small number of examples demonstrating the task, allowing it to learn in context and generalize to new, similar tasks 12. Chain-of-thought prompting encourages the model to break down complex problems into a series of intermediate reasoning steps, leading to more accurate and transparent solutions 12. The effectiveness of these techniques demonstrates the LLM's capacity to learn in context and follow intricate instructions without requiring explicit fine-tuning, suggesting a notable meta-learning ability. The model appears to identify and leverage patterns of reasoning presented in the prompts to apply similar logic when encountering new problems. Its ability to perform well even when labels in few-shot prompts are randomized 26 indicates a strong reliance on the format and structure of the provided examples. Furthermore, self-ask prompting 28 showcases the LLM's capability to decompose complex questions into smaller, more manageable sub-questions, mirroring a human-like problem-solving approach. Meta-prompting 37 extends this by enabling the LLM to reflect on its own performance and adjust its instructions accordingly, hinting at a basic form of self-improvement.

LLMs are extensively utilized for content creation and copywriting, capable of generating various types of text formats 41. This includes the generation of blog posts, social media content, product descriptions, and even creative writing such as stories and poems 41.

Question Answering and Information Retrieval

LLMs excel at answering questions based on the vast knowledge acquired during their training and the context provided in the input 4. They can handle general knowledge queries as well as more specialized questions within their training domain. To further enhance their question-answering capabilities, LLMs often employ Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) 12. RAG allows the model to access and incorporate information from external knowledge sources, such as vector databases, the internet, or other data repositories, to provide more accurate and up-to-date answers 12. This mechanism helps overcome limitations like the knowledge cut-off and the potential for hallucinations by grounding the model's responses in real-time or domain-specific information. The effectiveness of RAG is contingent upon the quality and relevance of the retrieved context. The LLM integrates this retrieved information as supplementary context within its reasoning process to formulate more pertinent and precise answers, indicating a capacity for dynamic information integration. The self-ask prompting technique 12 can be combined with RAG, where the LLM asks itself follow-up questions and uses a search engine to find the answers, demonstrating a more advanced approach to information retrieval and question answering.

Text Summarization and Analysis

LLMs can condense extensive textual data into concise summaries, employing both extractive methods, which select key sentences from the original text, and abstractive methods, which generate new sentences to capture the core ideas 41. Furthermore, LLMs are adept at performing sentiment analysis to gauge the emotional tone of text, identifying key topics discussed, and extracting relevant keywords from textual data like customer reviews, social media posts, and survey responses 41. This indicates a profound understanding of semantic relationships and contextual nuances within language that extends beyond mere keyword matching. In performing these tasks, the LLM analyzes the text to discern patterns of positive, negative, or neutral language, as well as identifying recurring themes and significant terms based on their frequency and context. For summarization, the LLM pinpoints the main ideas and supporting details before generating a condensed version, either by selecting existing sentences or by creating new ones that encapsulate the essence of the original text.

Language Translation and Multilingual Capabilities

LLMs possess the remarkable ability to translate text between a multitude of languages, drawing upon their training on vast multilingual datasets 2. Research suggests the presence of multilingual circuits within these models, which facilitate cross-lingual understanding and the transfer of knowledge across different linguistic frameworks 55. More advanced models, such as Claude 3.5 Haiku, exhibit an increased proportion of shared circuitry between languages, providing evidence for a shared abstract space where meaning is represented before being translated into specific languages 55. In performing translation, the LLM identifies the grammatical structures and semantic meanings in the source language and maps them to equivalent structures and meanings in the target language, leveraging its extensive training on diverse linguistic data. This process requires understanding the subtle nuances of various languages and adapting the translation accordingly to ensure accuracy and naturalness.

Acting as a Specific Persona

LLMs can be instructed to adopt specific roles or personas and respond in a manner consistent with the characteristics of that persona 4. This includes adopting the appropriate tone, style of language, and even the knowledge base associated with the given persona. By specifying a desired persona in the prompt, users can effectively guide the LLM to generate responses that align with the expected behavior and attributes of that role. This capability indicates a sophisticated understanding of social roles and communication styles, enabling the LLM to simulate different perspectives and behaviors as required by the prompt. In doing so, the LLM accesses information and patterns associated with the specified persona from its training data and utilizes these to shape its responses in terms of language, tone, and content, taking into account the typical communication style, knowledge domain, and potential biases inherent to that persona.

Knowledge Acquisition and Representation

The capabilities of large language models are deeply rooted in the vast amounts of data they are trained on and the mechanisms they employ to represent and access this knowledge.

Training Data and Pre-training Process

LLMs are trained on massive datasets comprising text from a multitude of sources, including web pages, books, research articles, and code repositories 2. Examples of such extensive datasets include Common Crawl and RefinedWeb 59. The quality, diversity, and pertinence of this training data are paramount for the model's ability to generate accurate and reliable outputs 56. High-quality data, characterized by its cleanliness and freedom from noise and biases, is essential for the model to learn effectively 56. The training process often involves both unsupervised and supervised pre-training techniques 8. Unsupervised pre-training allows the model to discern general language patterns from vast quantities of unlabeled data, while supervised pre-training can be employed for more specific tasks and to refine the model's understanding of particular domains 8. The sheer scale and diversity of the training data are crucial for the LLM's capacity to comprehend and generate human language across an extensive range of topics. However, it is important to note that any biases present within this training data can be inadvertently learned and subsequently reflected in the model's outputs. During the pre-training phase, the LLM learns to predict the next word in a sequence, thereby constructing a statistical model of language based on the intricate patterns and relationships it observes within the massive dataset. This learning process involves the continuous adjustment of the model's internal parameters, such as weights and biases, to minimize the error in its predictions.

Knowledge Cut-off Date

A fundamental limitation of LLMs is their knowledge cut-off date, which signifies the point in time after which the model has not been trained on any new information 50. This cut-off date is not uniform across all models and can vary depending on when the model was last updated with new training data. Consequently, LLMs may struggle to provide accurate or any information about events, discoveries, or developments that have occurred since their last training update. For instance, when queried about a recent news event that took place after the model's knowledge cut-off, the LLM might be unable to furnish an answer or may provide information that is outdated or inaccurate based on its older knowledge base 61. The static nature of the training data inherently bounds the LLM's knowledge to a specific temporal period, highlighting the necessity for mechanisms such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to enable access to more current and relevant information. The LLM's understanding is therefore constrained to the patterns and information it encountered in its training data up to the defined cut-off date. Unless explicitly provided with new information through context, it cannot access or process events that have transpired subsequently in real-time. When posed with a question about a post-cut-off event, the LLM will rely solely on its existing knowledge, which may not encompass the details of the requested information.

Internal Representation of Knowledge

LLMs represent and store the vast amount of knowledge they acquire during training within their parameters as intricate patterns and relationships between words and concepts 10. This involves encoding semantic relationships into high-dimensional vector spaces, commonly referred to as embeddings 10. Research into the internal workings of LLMs has revealed that they develop structured internal representations of both concrete aspects of knowledge, such as geographic locations and historical dates, and more abstract concepts 62. This suggests that these models are not merely memorizing surface-level linguistic patterns but are constructing a complex, albeit different from human understanding, representation of the world within their neural networks. The process of chain of thought reasoning within the LLM involves transforming words into these numerical vectors (embeddings) that capture their meaning and the relationships between them. These embeddings are then processed through multiple layers of the neural network, where complex patterns and associations are learned and subsequently stored. The attention mechanism plays a crucial role in this process by allowing the model to focus on the most relevant parts of these internal representations when processing input and generating output 10.

Reasoning and Information Processing

The ability of large language models to reason and process information is central to their utility across a wide range of applications.

Reasoning Process for Answering Questions

LLMs generate responses to questions by predicting the most probable next token in the sequence, based on the input prompt and the statistical model of language they have learned during training 5. This process is iterative, with each predicted token influencing the prediction of subsequent tokens until a complete response is generated or a predefined maximum length is reached. A key component of this process is the attention mechanism, which enables the model to weigh the importance of different parts of the input sequence when generating its response 11. Self-attention mechanisms, in particular, allow the model to understand the relationships between different words within the input 74. This focusing of attention on the most relevant information in the input allows for context-dependent processing and the generation of more coherent and accurate answers. The chain of thought reasoning process involves the LLM calculating attention scores for each word in the input relative to all other words, thereby determining their relevance to the specific task at hand. These attention scores are then used to weight the contribution of each word in the sequence when the model predicts the next token. The use of multi-head attention further enhances this capability by allowing the model to attend to different parts of the input in parallel, capturing a more nuanced understanding of the context 74.

Explaining Complex Topics

One of the notable capabilities of LLMs is their ability to elucidate complex topics in relatively simple terms, leveraging their broad understanding of language and the concepts it represents 76. This often involves breaking down intricate information into smaller, more digestible components that are easier for a user to grasp. LLMs can also employ techniques such as analogy and simplification to make the information more accessible to audiences with varying levels of prior knowledge. For example, an LLM might explain a highly technical concept as if it were addressing an 11-year-old or someone who is completely new to the field 76. This functionality highlights the LLM's capacity to abstract information from its complex internal representations and tailor its explanations to match the level of understanding of the intended user. In achieving this, the LLM first identifies the core concepts that define the complex topic and then systematically breaks these down into simpler, more fundamental elements. It then draws upon its vast training data to find simpler language and relatable analogies that can effectively convey these concepts to someone who may not have a technical background in the subject matter.

Handling Contradictory Statements

LLMs, by virtue of their training on extensive amounts of text, can often identify and sometimes address contradictory statements based on the knowledge they have acquired and their inherent logical reasoning abilities 8. Their exposure to a wide range of texts allows them to learn about common logical inconsistencies and factual discrepancies. However, these models often face challenges when attempting to resolve complex contradictions that necessitate a deeper understanding of the world and more nuanced reasoning capabilities 61. While LLMs can recognize surface-level contradictions in text, they typically struggle with logical inconsistencies that require a genuine understanding of causal relationships and the broader context of the information. Their reasoning process, while capable of basic logical inferences, is more fundamentally based on statistical pattern matching than on abstract logical principles. When presented with contradictory statements, the LLM compares these against its internal knowledge base, attempting to identify inconsistencies based on the frequency and co-occurrence of the concepts involved. However, its reliance on statistical patterns rather than a robust logical framework limits its ability to resolve complex contradictions that might require a deeper, more semantic understanding of the information. For instance, while an LLM might identify a statistical improbability of two statements being true simultaneously, it may not fully grasp the underlying logical conflict or be able to deduce a resolution without more explicit guidance or a broader contextual understanding.

Safety Protocols and Ethical Considerations

The deployment of large language models necessitates careful consideration of safety protocols and ethical guidelines to ensure responsible and beneficial use.

Response to Harmful Requests

LLMs are equipped with built-in safety guidelines designed to prevent the generation of content that is harmful, unethical, or illegal 2. These guidelines are often implemented through various safety layers and content filtering mechanisms that work to identify and block the generation of inappropriate material. When a user asks for information that falls outside these established guidelines, the LLM typically responds by refusing to answer the request or by providing a disclaimer that it cannot fulfill the request due to safety policies 55. These safety protocols are crucial for ensuring the responsible application of LLMs and for mitigating potential harms that could arise from the generation of dangerous or inappropriate content. However, it is important to acknowledge that these safeguards are not always impenetrable and can sometimes be circumvented through the use of sophisticated adversarial prompting techniques. When an LLM detects a harmful request, it initiates its safety mechanisms, which may involve identifying specific keywords or patterns that are associated with harmful content. Following this detection, the model formulates a response that either refuses to provide the requested information or offers a safe and appropriate alternative, thereby upholding its safety guidelines.

Handling Information Outside Safety Guidelines

LLMs are designed to proactively avoid generating responses that violate safety policies, even in cases where the initial request from a user is not explicitly harmful 89. This includes refraining from producing hate speech, discriminatory content, or any information that could potentially be misused for illegal activities. To achieve this, LLMs incorporate content moderation and filtering mechanisms [45, 102, 86, 178, 103, 102, 86, 169, 83, 44, 179, S_R409]. These mechanisms often involve input validation processes to screen user prompts for potentially problematic content and output filtering to ensure that the generated text adheres to safety standards. Such proactive safety measures are essential for preventing the generation of undesirable content and for maintaining user trust in the reliability and ethical behavior of LLMs. Continuous monitoring and regular updates to these safety mechanisms are also vital to effectively address evolving threats and ensure ongoing compliance with ethical guidelines. When an LLM analyzes an input and its potential output against a set of predefined safety criteria, and if the output is determined to be unsafe, the generation process is either halted before completion or modified to ensure compliance with the established guidelines. This might involve adjusting the probabilities of certain tokens within the model's vocabulary to favor safer words and phrases, thereby steering the output away from harmful content.

Adversarial Prompting and Vulnerabilities

Despite the safety measures implemented in large language models, they are susceptible to manipulation through adversarial prompting. This involves crafting specific inputs designed to exploit vulnerabilities in the model's architecture or training, leading it to bypass safety filters and generate harmful, misleading, or unintended content 86. Various techniques are employed in adversarial prompting, including prompt injection, where malicious instructions are embedded within seemingly innocuous prompts, jailbreaking, which aims to trick the model into ignoring its safety protocols, and prompt leaking, which seeks to extract sensitive information from the model's prompts or training data 86. The vulnerability of LLMs to these adversarial techniques underscores the ongoing and critical need for research and development into robust defense mechanisms that can effectively ensure their safe and reliable deployment across various applications. Adversarial prompts often capitalize on the LLM's fundamental reliance on pattern recognition within the input text. By carefully constructing misleading instructions or by using specific linguistic tricks, attackers can effectively override the model's intended behavior and the safety protocols that are in place. Developing defenses against these attacks often involves fine-tuning the models to recognize adversarial patterns or implementing more sophisticated input and output filtering mechanisms that can detect and neutralize malicious prompts.

Limitations and Biases

While large language models exhibit impressive capabilities, they also possess inherent limitations and are prone to biases that can affect their performance and the nature of their responses.

Limitations of Knowledge and Abilities

A primary limitation of LLMs is their knowledge cut-off date, which restricts their awareness of events and information beyond a certain point in time 50. Furthermore, these models lack the grounding of real-world experience and the intuitive common sense reasoning that humans possess 8. This can lead to situations where the model generates plausible-sounding but factually incorrect information, a phenomenon known as hallucination 1. Additionally, LLMs often struggle with complex reasoning tasks that require multiple steps, intricate problem-solving, and nuanced logical deduction 8. These limitations primarily arise from the LLM's fundamental reliance on statistical patterns learned from its training data, rather than a genuine understanding of the world and abstract logical principles. The chain of thought process in an LLM is driven by probabilities and associations derived from the vast amounts of text it has processed. Consequently, it may encounter difficulties with tasks that demand abstract thought, the ability to infer causality, or the processing of information that falls outside the scope of its training distribution. For example, LLMs often find it challenging to solve mathematical problems that involve multi-step reasoning or to fully comprehend complex physical processes 61.

Biases Present in Responses

Due to the nature of the data they are trained on, LLMs can exhibit various biases, including those related to gender, race, culture, and socioeconomic status [1, 107, 102, 180, 104, 181, 129, 182, 104, 104, 134, 133, 105, 130, 108, 106, 132, 102, 130, 44, 131, 106, 100, 178, 103, 105, 105, 102, 106, 104, 183, 184, 178, 185, 186, 104, 105, 187, 169, 83, 44, 179, S_R409]. These biases can manifest in the LLM's outputs, leading to the reinforcement of stereotypes and potentially resulting in unfair or discriminatory outcomes [102, 104, 129, 182, 104, 104, 134, 105, 130, 108, 106, 132, 102, 130, 44, 131, 106, 100, 178, 103, 105, 105, 102, 106, 104, 183, 184, 178, 185, 186, 104, 105, 187, 169, 83, 44, 179, S_R409]. For example, LLMs might associate certain professions more strongly with specific genders or exhibit racial stereotypes in their responses. Due to the black-box nature of these models and the inherent complexity of societal biases, completely removing these biases presents a significant challenge 102. Debiasing techniques often require careful tuning and may inadvertently introduce new challenges or affect the model's overall performance. Bias in LLMs is a critical ethical and societal concern that necessitates a multi-faceted approach to mitigation, involving careful data curation, targeted model fine-tuning, and continuous ongoing monitoring. The chain of thought process underlying these biases is that the LLM learns from the statistical patterns present in its training data, which inevitably reflect the biases that exist in the vast amount of text it has processed. Addressing these biases effectively requires deliberate intervention to alter these learned patterns or to guide the model towards generating more equitable and unbiased outputs, often through the application of techniques such as data augmentation and adversarial debiasing.

Evaluation and Transparency

The evaluation of large language models is crucial for understanding their capabilities, limitations, and biases. Transparency in their development and deployment is equally important for building trust and enabling responsible use.

Reasoning Process for Answering a Previous Question

To illustrate the reasoning process for answering a previous question, let's consider the query: "What is the capital of France?". When this question is posed to the LLM, it first processes the input, breaking it down into tokens. The attention mechanism then identifies the key terms, "capital" and "France," and assigns them higher importance. The model accesses its internal knowledge base, which contains information learned during pre-training. Based on the association between "France" and "capital," the model retrieves "Paris" as the most probable answer. Finally, the LLM generates the response: "The capital of France is Paris." This process involves understanding the question, accessing relevant knowledge, and formulating a coherent answer based on probabilistic predictions.

Identification of Potential Biases

LLMs possess a degree of ability to identify potential biases in their responses based on the patterns and associations learned from their training data 47. This can involve analyzing the generated text for language that might be considered biased or stereotypical. Furthermore, the field has developed various bias benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics to systematically detect and quantify biases in LLMs 107. Examples of these datasets include BBQ, BOLD, and StereoSet, which are designed to test for biases across different demographic attributes. Evaluation metrics can measure disparities in the model's responses across various groups defined by sensitive characteristics such as gender, race, or religion. While LLMs can identify some potential biases, their awareness is inherently limited by the scope and nature of their training and the specific bias detection methods that are employed. Therefore, human oversight and expert evaluation remain crucial for a comprehensive assessment of bias in these models. The chain of thought process through which an LLM identifies potential biases involves analyzing its generated text for language patterns and associations that are known to be indicative of bias, based on its training and any specific instructions or tools that are designed for bias detection. This might involve comparing the word embeddings of certain terms or using classifiers that have been specifically trained to identify biased language.

Transparency in Model Release and Documentation

Transparency in the release and documentation of AI models, particularly large language models, is of paramount importance for fostering trust, enabling informed use, and promoting responsible development 2. This includes providing detailed information about the data used to train the model, the specifics of the model's architecture and its underlying parameters, as well as any known limitations or potential biases that users should be aware of. Model cards serve as a valuable tool in this regard, offering a structured format for conveying essential information about a model's intended use cases, its inherent capabilities, and any associated risks 58. While transparency is widely recognized as essential for building trust in LLMs and facilitating their responsible development and application, the actual level of transparency can vary significantly across different models and the organizations that develop them. Developers and researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of documenting the various facets of an LLM's development and behavior to provide users with a clearer understanding of its capabilities and inherent limitations. This documentation often includes specifics about the data it was trained on, the methodologies employed during training, and the intended design and purpose of the model, as well as a candid discussion of any potential risks and biases that users should be mindful of when interacting with the LLM.

Conclusion

Large language models represent a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, demonstrating remarkable capabilities in text generation, question answering, summarization, and language translation. Their ability to handle various tasks and even adopt specific personas highlights their versatility and potential across numerous applications. However, it is crucial to acknowledge their fundamental limitations, such as knowledge cut-off dates, constraints in reasoning abilities, and the potential for generating inaccurate information or exhibiting biases. Understanding these limitations is paramount for the responsible use and continued development of LLMs. Ongoing research and development efforts are actively focused on enhancing the capabilities of these models, improving their safety and reliability, and increasing their transparency to ensure that they can be deployed in a manner that maximizes their benefits while minimizing potential risks.

Technique	Approach	Benefits
Zero-shot CoT	Adding "Let's think step by step" to the prompt	Encourages reasoning without examples
Few-shot CoT	Providing examples of reasoning steps in the prompt	Guides the model with relevant demonstrations
Self-Consistency	Generating multiple reasoning paths and selecting the most consistent answer	Improves reliability by filtering inconsistencies
Contrastive CoT	Showing correct and wrong explanations	Helps the model understand what not to do
Faithful CoT	Ensuring reasoning aligns with the final answer	Avoids reasoning that diverges from the correct answer
Automatic CoT	Clustering questions and generating reasoning chains automatically	Overcomes the need for manual example writing
Step-Back Prompting	Prompting the model to think about a more general version of the problem	Helps in understanding the core issue before tackling specifics
Analogical Prompting	Providing analogies to guide the reasoning process	Can assist in solving problems by relating them to similar, understood scenarios
Thread-of-Thought	Encouraging the model to maintain a coherent line of reasoning	Improves the flow and logical structure of the generated text
Tabular Chain of Thought	Using tables to structure the reasoning process	Can be beneficial for problems involving structured data or multiple entities
AutoReason	Using a stronger model to generate reasoning chains for a weaker model	Leverages the strengths of different models for improved efficiency and potentially lower cost

Bias Category	Manifestation Examples
Gender Bias	Recommending lower-paying jobs for women more often than men 102; associating "nurse" with women and "engineer" with men 104; using male pronouns as the default 129; recommending humanities for women and science for men 130; generating job descriptions with more stereotypes than those written by humans 105.
Racial Bias	Recommending "construction worker" more often for Mexican individuals 102; higher violent bias against Muslims 129; recommending clerical work for minority names and supervisor positions for Caucasian names 130; flagging tweets with minority identity mentions as toxic more often 131.
Cultural Bias	Overrepresentation of Western perspectives 132; skewed understanding of non-Western cultures 106; bias in sentiment towards different religions 108.
Socioeconomic Bias	Associating "successful" primarily with white-collar occupations 133.
Age Bias	Stereotypes related to age (e.g., age and negativity) 130; differing quality of response based on inferred age 102.
Disability Bias	Outputting stereotypes or negative associations regarding individuals with disabilities 133.
Political Bias	Reflecting political biases present in training data, potentially leading to disinformation 104.
Representational Bias	Underrepresentation or misrepresentation of certain demographic groups in training data, leading to skewed outputs [1, 132, 106, 102, 104, 183, 178, 185, 186, 104, 105, 187, 169, 83, 44, 179, S_R409].

Metric	Description	Relevance
Perplexity	Measures the model's uncertainty in predicting the next token	Assesses fluency and coherence 135
BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy)	Measures the overlap of n-grams between the generated and reference text	Evaluates translation quality and text similarity 135
ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation)	Measures the overlap of n-grams, LCS, and skip-bigrams between the generated and reference text	Assesses summarization quality and content coverage 135
Accuracy	Proportion of correct predictions	Measures the correctness of responses 104
F1 Score	Harmonic mean of precision and recall	Evaluates performance in classification and question answering 104
Human Evaluation	Subjective assessment by human judges	Provides qualitative insights into fluency, coherence, relevance, and factuality 35

Works cited

Responsible Use of LLMs in Research: Moving Beyond the Hype | Accelerate Programme, accessed March 29, 2025, https://science.ai.cam.ac.uk/2025/01/13/responsible-use-of-llms-in-research-moving-beyond-the-hype
The best large language models (LLMs) in 2025 - Zapier, accessed March 29, 2025, https://zapier.com/blog/best-llm/
LLMs Across Industries: Recent Research on Large Language Models - Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence | Chicago Booth, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.chicagobooth.edu/research/center-for-applied-artificial-intelligence/stories/2025/llms-across-industries
A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations - ResearchGate, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387863060_A_Survey_on_Large_Language_Models_with_some_Insights_on_their_Capabilities_and_Limitations
What is a Large Language Model (LLM) - GeeksforGeeks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/large-language-model-llm/
What is an LLM? A Guide on Large Language Models and How They Work - DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/what-is-an-llm-a-guide-on-large-language-models
Guide to Large Language Models (LLMs) Explained | Balbix, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.balbix.com/insights/what-is-large-language-model-llm/
A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitations - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2501.04040v1
Developer quickstart - OpenAI API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://platform.openai.com/docs/quickstart
Key concepts - OpenAI API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://platform.openai.com/docs/introduction
What is LLM? - Large Language Models Explained - AWS, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/large-language-model/
Prompt Engineering for LLM - C. Cui's Blog, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cuicaihao.com/2024/02/04/prompt-engineering-for-llm/
What is Zero-Shot Prompting? Examples & Applications - Digital Adoption, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.digital-adoption.com/zero-shot-prompting/
How to Choose Your GenAI Prompting Strategy: Zero Shot vs. Few Shot Prompts - Matillion, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.matillion.com/blog/gen-ai-prompt-strategy-zero-shot-few-shot-prompt
Zero-Shot vs. Few-Shot Prompting: Key Differences - Shelf - Shelf.io, accessed March 29, 2025, https://shelf.io/blog/zero-shot-and-few-shot-prompting/
What is Zero-shot prompting and One-shot prompting? - Automation Anywhere | Community, accessed March 29, 2025, https://community.automationanywhere.com/developers-forum-36/what-is-zero-shot-prompting-and-one-shot-prompting-86895
Zero-Shot Prompting: Examples, Theory, Use Cases - DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/zero-shot-prompting
Zero-Shot Learning vs. Few-Shot Learning vs. Fine-Tuning: A technical walkthrough using OpenAI's APIs & models - Labelbox, accessed March 29, 2025, https://labelbox.com/guides/zero-shot-learning-few-shot-learning-fine-tuning/
Few-Shot and Zero-Shot Learning in LLMs: Unlocking Cross-Domain Generalization, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@anicomanesh/mastering-few-shot-and-zero-shot-learning-in-llms-a-deep-dive-into-cross-domain-generalization-b33f779f5259
What is few shot prompting? - IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/few-shot-prompting
Few-Shot Prompting: Examples, Theory, Use Cases | DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/few-shot-prompting
The Power of Few-Shot Learning in Language Models | by Pankaj - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@pankaj_pandey/the-power-of-few-shot-learning-in-language-models-4fe79060fef4
What Is Few-Shot Learning? - IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/few-shot-learning
Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning with LLMs - neptune.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://neptune.ai/blog/zero-shot-and-few-shot-learning-with-llms
Shot-Based Prompting: Zero-Shot, One-Shot, and Few-Shot Prompting, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/basics/few_shot
Few-Shot Prompting - Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/techniques/fewshot
Chain of Thought Prompting Guide - PromptHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.prompthub.us/blog/chain-of-thought-prompting-guide
12 Prompt Engineering Techniques - HumanFirst, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.humanfirst.ai/blog/12-prompt-engineering-techniques
12 Prompt Engineering Techniques - Cobus Greyling - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cobusgreyling.medium.com/12-prompt-engineering-techniques-644481c857aa
Chain-of-Thought Prompting: Step-by-Step Reasoning with LLMs | DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/chain-of-thought-prompting
Chain of Thought Prompting - .NET - Learn Microsoft, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/ai/conceptual/chain-of-thought-prompting
Chain-of-Thought Prompting - Learn Prompting, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/intermediate/chain_of_thought
Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques - Mercity AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.mercity.ai/blog-post/advanced-prompt-engineering-techniques
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting - Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/techniques/cot
LLM-as-a-judge: a complete guide to using LLMs for evaluations - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-as-a-judge
Self-Ask - Mirascope, accessed March 29, 2025, https://mirascope.com/tutorials/prompt_engineering/text_based/self_ask/
Use Meta-Prompting - Helicone OSS LLM Observability, accessed March 29, 2025, https://docs.helicone.ai/guides/prompt-engineering/use-meta-prompting
Meta-Prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-Agnostic Scaffolding - GitHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://github.com/suzgunmirac/meta-prompting
A Complete Guide to Meta Prompting - PromptHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.prompthub.us/blog/a-complete-guide-to-meta-prompting
Meta Prompts - Because Your LLM Can Do Better Than Hello World : r/LocalLLaMA - Reddit, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1i2b2eo/meta_prompts_because_your_llm_can_do_better_than/
What Can LLM API Be Used For? - Fuel Your Digital, accessed March 29, 2025, https://fuelyourdigital.com/post/what-can-llm-api-be-used-for/
7 LLM use cases and applications in 2024 - AssemblyAI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/llm-use-cases/
LLM APIs: Use Cases,Tools, & Best Practices for 2025 - Orq.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://orq.ai/blog/llm-api-use-cases
Understanding LLMs and overcoming their limitations - Lumenalta, accessed March 29, 2025, https://lumenalta.com/insights/understanding-llms-overcoming-limitations
Top 9 Large Language Models as of March 2025 | Shakudo, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.shakudo.io/blog/top-9-large-language-models
An Introduction to LLM Benchmarking - Confident AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.confident-ai.com/blog/the-current-state-of-benchmarking-llms
Self-Ask Prompting - Cobus Greyling - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cobusgreyling.medium.com/self-ask-prompting-d0805ea31faa
Self-Ask Prompting: Improving LLM Reasoning with Step-by-Step Question Breakdown - Learn Prompting, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learnprompting.org/docs/advanced/few_shot/self_ask
7 Top Large Language Model Use Cases And Applications - ProjectPro, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.projectpro.io/article/large-language-model-use-cases-and-applications/887
Gemini API reference | Google AI for Developers, accessed March 29, 2025, https://ai.google.dev/api
LLMs For Curating Your Social Media Feeds? Yes Please! - HackerNoon, accessed March 29, 2025, https://hackernoon.com/llms-for-curating-your-social-media-feeds-yes-please
LLMs for Social Media Sentiment Analysis: A Technical Look - Sift AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.getsift.ai/blog/social-media-sentiment-analysis
www.pecan.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.pecan.ai/blog/llm-data-analytics-work-together/#:~:text=LLMs%20can%20be%20utilized%20to,topics%2C%20and%20extract%20relevant%20keywords.
How LLMs and Data Analytics Work Together - Pecan AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.pecan.ai/blog/llm-data-analytics-work-together/
Tracing the thoughts of a large language model - Anthropic, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.anthropic.com/research/tracing-thoughts-language-model
Ultimate Guide to LLM Training Data - Bright Data, accessed March 29, 2025, https://brightdata.com/blog/web-data/llm-training-data
LLM Training Data: The 8 Main Public Data Sources - Oxylabs, accessed March 29, 2025, https://oxylabs.io/blog/llm-training-data
Meta Llama 2, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.llama.com/llama2/
Open-Sourced Training Datasets for Large Language Models (LLMs) - Kili Technology, accessed March 29, 2025, https://kili-technology.com/large-language-models-llms/9-open-sourced-datasets-for-training-large-language-models
Understanding LLM Training Data: A Comprehensive Guide - Uniphore, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.uniphore.com/glossary/llm-training-data/
What Are the Limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs)? - PromptDrive.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://promptdrive.ai/llm-limitations/
Large Language Models develop structured internal representations of both space and time., accessed March 29, 2025, https://onyxaero.com/news/language-models-develop-structured-internal-representations-of-both-space-and-time/
Perception of Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models through Semi-open-ended Question Answering | PromptLayer, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.promptlayer.com/research-papers/perception-of-knowledge-boundary-for-large-language-models-through-semi-open-ended-question-answering
Probing the Decision Boundaries of In-context Learning in Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=FbXQrfkvtY&referrer=%5Bthe%20profile%20of%20Aditya%20Grover%5D(%2Fprofile%3Fid%3D~Aditya_Grover1)
Probing the Decision Boundaries of In-context Learning in Large Language Models - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2406.11233v1
Teaching Large Language Models to Express Knowledge Boundary from Their Own Signals, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2406.10881v1
arxiv.org, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.05817v1#:~:text=In%20order%20to%20probe%20LLMs,subject%20(see%20Figure%201).
Probing Language Models on Their Knowledge Source - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2410.05817v1
Day 44: Probing Tasks for LLMs - DEV Community, accessed March 29, 2025, https://dev.to/nareshnishad/day-44-probing-tasks-for-llms-2c06
Estimating Knowledge in Large Language Models Without Generating a Single Token, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2406.12673v1
KGLens: Towards Efficient and Effective Knowledge Probing of Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs - Apple Machine Learning Research, accessed March 29, 2025, https://machinelearning.apple.com/research/kglens-towards-efficient
Large language models use a surprisingly simple mechanism to retrieve some stored knowledge | MIT News, accessed March 29, 2025, https://news.mit.edu/2024/large-language-models-use-surprisingly-simple-mechanism-retrieve-stored-knowledge-0325
What is an attention mechanism? | IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/attention-mechanism
What is Attention and Why Do LLMs and Transformers Need It? | DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/attention-mechanism-in-llms-intuition
Attention Heads of Large Language Models: A Survey - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2409.03752v1
26 principles for prompt engineering to increase LLM accuracy 57% - Codingscape, accessed March 29, 2025, https://codingscape.com/blog/26-principles-for-prompt-engineering-to-increase-llm-accuracy
The Strengths and Limitations of Large Language Models in Reasoning, Planning, and Code Integration | by Jacob Grow | Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@Gbgrow/the-strengths-and-limitations-of-large-language-models-in-reasoning-planning-and-code-41b7a190240c
Can AI Truly Reason, or Is It Just Guesswork? A Deep Dive into LLM Limitations - Next Steps, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.nextsteps.dev/posts/challenges-llm-limitations
Understanding LLMs' Reasoning Limits Today: Insights to Shape ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@parserdigital/understanding-llms-reasoning-limits-today-insights-to-shape-your-future-strategy-fc1c27c9e904
Testing the cognitive limits of large language models - Bank for International Settlements, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.bis.org/publ/bisbull83.htm
Benefits And Limitations Of LLM - AiThority, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aithority.com/machine-learning/benefits-and-limitations-of-llm/
LLM Reasoning: Key Ideas and Limitations | by Kamesh Dubey | Mar, 2025, accessed March 29, 2025, https://kameshdubey.medium.com/from-text-to-reasoning-how-llms-are-evolving-into-ai-agents-c9aedf597e26
Seven limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) in recruitment technology - Textkernel, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.textkernel.com/learn-support/blog/seven-limitations-of-llms-in-hr-tech/
Limitations of LLM Reasoning - DZone, accessed March 29, 2025, https://dzone.com/articles/llm-reasoning-limitations
Adversarial Prompting in LLMs - Prompt Engineering Guide, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.promptingguide.ai/risks/adversarial
Preventing Adversarial Prompt Injections with LLM Guardrails - Kili Technology, accessed March 29, 2025, https://kili-technology.com/large-language-models-llms/preventing-adversarial-prompt-injections-with-llm-guardrails
Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/vulnerabilities-in-large-language-models
What's New in the 2025 OWASP Top 10 for LLMs - AppSecEngineer, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.appsecengineer.com/blog/whats-new-in-the-2025-owasp-top-10-for-llms
Adversarial prompting - Testing and strengthening the security and safety of large language models - IBM Developer, accessed March 29, 2025, https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/awb-adversarial-prompting-security-llms/
Vulnerabilities of Large Language Models to Adversarial Attacks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://llm-vulnerability.github.io/
Trustworthy-AI-Group/Adversarial_Examples_Papers: A list of recent papers about adversarial learning - GitHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://github.com/Trustworthy-AI-Group/Adversarial_Examples_Papers
ProAdvPrompter: A Two-Stage Journey to Effective Adversarial Prompting for LLMs, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=tpHqsyZ3YX
AI Safety: Classifying Large Language Models (LLMs) Exploits | by Julian B | Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@julian.burns50/an-in-depth-guide-to-exploits-for-large-language-models-llms-403b287095bb
Adversarial Attacks on LLMs - Lil'Log, accessed March 29, 2025, https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-10-25-adv-attack-llm/
Adversarial Prompts in LLMs - A Comprehensive Guide - ADaSci, accessed March 29, 2025, https://adasci.org/adversarial-prompts-in-llms-a-comprehensive-guide/
The Ultimate Guide to Red Teaming LLMs and Adversarial Prompts (Examples and Steps), accessed March 29, 2025, https://kili-technology.com/large-language-models-llms/red-teaming-llms-and-adversarial-prompts
OWASP Top 10 Risks for Large Language Models: 2025 updates - Barracuda Blog, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.barracuda.com/2024/11/20/owasp-top-10-risks-large-language-models-2025-updates
A guide to the OWASP TOP 10 for large language model applications - Redscan, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.redscan.com/news/a-guide-to-the-owasp-top-10-for-large-language-model-applications/
BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystack, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=u7m2CG84BQ
The Strengths and Limitations of Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://newsletter.ericbrown.com/p/strengths-and-limitations-of-large-language-models
Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A Survey - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.12472v1
How to Identify and Prevent Bias in LLM Algorithms - FairNow, accessed March 29, 2025, https://fairnow.ai/blog-identify-and-prevent-llm-bias/
How can biases in LLMs be mitigated? - Milvus, accessed March 29, 2025, https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/how-can-biases-in-llms-be-mitigated
Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) - DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/understanding-and-mitigating-bias-in-large-language-models-llms
How to mitigate bias in LLMs (Large Language Models) - Hello Future, accessed March 29, 2025, https://hellofuture.orange.com/en/how-to-avoid-replicating-bias-and-human-error-in-llms/
Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2411.10915v1
Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluators - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2309.17012v2
Assessing Biases in LLMs: From Basic Tasks to Hiring Decisions - Holistic AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.holisticai.com/blog/assessing-biases-in-llms
i-gallegos/Fair-LLM-Benchmark - GitHub, accessed March 29, 2025, https://github.com/i-gallegos/Fair-LLM-Benchmark
leobeeson/llm_benchmarks: A collection of benchmarks and datasets for evaluating LLM., accessed March 29, 2025, https://github.com/leobeeson/llm_benchmarks
SuperGLUE Dataset | Papers With Code, accessed March 29, 2025, https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/superglue
100+ LLM benchmarks and evaluation datasets - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-evaluation-benchmarks-datasets
20 LLM evaluation benchmarks and how they work - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-benchmarks
AI Benchmarks and Datasets for LLM Evaluation - arXiv, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2412.01020v1
What Are LLM Benchmarks? - IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/llm-benchmarks
What is SuperGLUE? - Klu.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://klu.ai/glossary/superglue-eval
MMLU | DeepEval - The Open-Source LLM Evaluation Framework, accessed March 29, 2025, https://docs.confident-ai.com/docs/benchmarks-mmlu
Bringing transparency to the data used to train artificial intelligence - MIT Sloan, accessed March 29, 2025, https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/bringing-transparency-to-data-used-to-train-artificial-intelligence
API Reference - OpenAI API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference
Libraries - OpenAI API, accessed March 29, 2025, https://platform.openai.com/docs/libraries
Documentation | Llama, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.llama.com/get-started/
Beyond open vs. closed: Understanding the spectrum of AI transparency - Sonatype, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.sonatype.com/blog/beyond-open-vs.-closed-understanding-the-spectrum-of-ai-transparency
What Is AI Transparency? | IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-transparency
Why transparency is key to unlocking AI's full potential - The World Economic Forum, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/why-transparency-key-to-unlocking-ai-full-potential/
What is AI transparency? A comprehensive guide - Zendesk, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.zendesk.com/blog/ai-transparency/
The Explainability Challenge of Generative AI and LLMs - OCEG, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.oceg.org/the-explainability-challenge-of-generative-ai-and-llms/
Is Your LLM Leaking Sensitive Data? A Developer's Guide to Preventing Sensitive Information Disclosure - Pangea.Cloud, accessed March 29, 2025, https://pangea.cloud/blog/a-developers-guide-to-preventing-sensitive-information-disclosure/
Private LLMs: Data Protection Potential and Limitations - Skyflow, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.skyflow.com/post/private-llms-data-protection-potential-and-limitations
Full article: Debiasing large language models: research opportunities* - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03036758.2024.2398567
Explicitly unbiased large language models still form biased associations - PNAS, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2416228122
Challenges in Automated Debiasing for Toxic Language Detection - NSF-PAR, accessed March 29, 2025, https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10309653
Understanding Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models (LLMs) | Uniathena, accessed March 29, 2025, https://uniathena.com/understanding-bias-fairness-large-language-models-llms
Bias Detection in LLM Outputs: Statistical Approaches - MachineLearningMastery.com, accessed March 29, 2025, https://machinelearningmastery.com/bias-detection-in-llm-outputs-statistical-approaches/
Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) - Digital Bricks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.digitalbricks.ai/blog-posts/understanding-and-mitigating-bias-in-large-language-models-llms
LLM Evaluation: Metrics, Methodologies, Best Practices - DataCamp, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/llm-evaluation
LLM evaluation metrics and methods - Evidently AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-evaluation-metrics
Perplexity: How to calculate perplexity to evaluate the confidence of ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://docs.kolena.com/metrics/perplexity/
Decoding Perplexity and its significance in LLMs - UpTrain AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.uptrain.ai/decoding-perplexity-and-its-significance-in-llms/
LLM Benchmarks Explained: Significance, Metrics & Challenges | Generative AI Collaboration Platform, accessed March 29, 2025, https://orq.ai/blog/llm-benchmarks
LLM Evaluation: Metrics, Frameworks, and Best Practices | SuperAnnotate, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.superannotate.com/blog/llm-evaluation-guide
Understanding Perplexity and Burstiness in AI Text Generation - AI writing tools, accessed March 29, 2025, https://writingtools.ai/tools/perplexity-and-burstiness-text-generator
LLM Evaluation: Key Metrics, Best Practices and Frameworks - Aisera, accessed March 29, 2025, https://aisera.com/blog/llm-evaluation/
Two minutes NLP — Learn the ROUGE metric by examples | by Fabio Chiusano - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/nlplanet/two-minutes-nlp-learn-the-rouge-metric-by-examples-f179cc285499
Evaluating the performance of LLM summarization prompts with G-Eval | Microsoft Learn, accessed March 29, 2025, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/playbook/technology-guidance/generative-ai/working-with-llms/evaluation/g-eval-metric-for-summarization
Evaluating Model Performance with the ROUGE Metric: A Comprehensive Guide | Traceloop, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.traceloop.com/blog/evaluating-model-performance-with-the-rouge-metric-a-comprehensive-guide
The Challenges of Evaluating Large Language Models | by Mattafrank - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@Matthew_Frank/the-challenges-of-evaluating-large-language-models-ec2eb834a349
ROUGE (metric) - Wikipedia, accessed March 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROUGE_(metric)
LLM Evaluation Metrics Every Developer Should Know - Comet.ml, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.comet.com/site/blog/llm-evaluation-metrics-every-developer-should-know/
LLM Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translations: A Complete Guide [2024 Study] - Orq.ai, accessed March 29, 2025, https://orq.ai/blog/llm-evaluation-metrics
Define your evaluation metrics | Generative AI - Google Cloud, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/models/determine-eval
Evaluate models | Cloud Translation, accessed March 29, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/translate/docs/advanced/automl-evaluate
Understanding MT Quality: BLEU Scores - ModernMT Blog, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.modernmt.com/understanding-mt-quality-bleu-scores/
Demystifying the BLEU Metric: A Comprehensive Guide to Machine ..., accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.traceloop.com/blog/demystifying-the-bleu-metric
BLEU evaluation metric - IBM, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/watsonx/saas?topic=metrics-bleu
Understanding BLEU and ROUGE score for NLP evaluation | by Sthanikam Santhosh, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/@sthanikamsanthosh1994/understanding-bleu-and-rouge-score-for-nlp-evaluation-1ab334ecadcb
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using BLEU score over ROUGE score in machine translation evaluation? - Massed Compute, accessed March 29, 2025, https://massedcompute.com/faq-answers/?question=What+are+the+advantages+and+disadvantages+of+using+BLEU+score+over+ROUGE+score+in+machine+translation+evaluation%3F
BLEU | Machine Translate, accessed March 29, 2025, https://machinetranslate.org/bleu
www.traceloop.com, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.traceloop.com/blog/demystifying-the-bleu-metric#:~:text=BLEU%20is%20a%20metric%20used,the%20human%2Dtranslated%20reference%20text.
ROUGE Metric In NLP: Complete Guide & How To Tutorial In Python - Spot Intelligence, accessed March 29, 2025, https://spotintelligence.com/2024/08/12/rouge-metric-in-nlp/
Unveiling the Power of ROUGE Metrics in NLP | by Yajna Bopaiah | AI Mind, accessed March 29, 2025, https://pub.aimind.so/unveiling-the-power-of-rouge-metrics-in-nlp-b6d3f96d3363
Comprehensive 10+ LLM Evaluation: From BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR to Scenario-Based Metrics like… - Rupak (Bob) Roy, accessed March 29, 2025, https://bobrupakroy.medium.com/comprehensive-10-llm-evaluation-from-bleu-rouge-and-meteor-to-scenario-based-metrics-like-9f6602c92c17
Which natural language generation metrics (e.g., BLEU, ROUGE, METEOR) can be used to compare a RAG system's answers to reference answers, and what are the limitations of these metrics in this context? - Milvus, accessed March 29, 2025, https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/which-natural-language-generation-metrics-eg-bleu-rouge-meteor-can-be-used-to-compare-a-rag-systems-answers-to-reference-answers-and-what-are-the-limitations-of-these-metrics-in-this-context
What are the limitations of using BLEU and ROUGE scores in evaluating machine translation models? - Massed Compute, accessed March 29, 2025, https://massedcompute.com/faq-answers/?question=What+are+the+limitations+of+using+BLEU+and+ROUGE+scores+in+evaluating+machine+translation+models%3F
How to Evaluate LLM Summarization | by Isaac Tham | TDS Archive - Medium, accessed March 29, 2025, https://medium.com/data-science/how-to-evaluate-llm-summarization-18a040c3905d
LLM Evaluation: Top 10 Metrics and Benchmarks - Kolena, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.kolena.com/guides/llm-evaluation-top-10-metrics-and-benchmarks/
A Complete Guide to LLM Evaluation and Benchmarking - Turing, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.turing.com/resources/understanding-llm-evaluation-and-benchmarks
LLM Evaluation: Key Metrics, Methods, Challenges, and Best Practices - Openxcell, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.openxcell.com/blog/llm-evaluation/
LLM Evaluation Metrics: The Ultimate LLM Evaluation Guide - Confident AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.confident-ai.com/blog/llm-evaluation-metrics-everything-you-need-for-llm-evaluation
A Practical Guide to Recognizing Bias in LLM Outputs - Appy Pie, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.appypie.com/blog/recognizing-bias-in-llm-outputs
LLM Evaluation: Everything You Need To Run, Benchmark LLM Evals - Arize AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://arize.com/blog-course/llm-evaluation-the-definitive-guide/
Evaluating Creativity: Can LLMs Be Good Evaluators in Creative Writing Tasks? - MDPI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/6/2971
LLM Evaluations: Techniques, Challenges, and Best Practices - Label Studio, accessed March 29, 2025, https://labelstud.io/blog/llm-evaluations-techniques-challenges-and-best-practices/
LLM evaluations: Metrics, frameworks, and best practices | genai-research - Wandb, accessed March 29, 2025, https://wandb.ai/onlineinference/genai-research/reports/LLM-evaluations-Metrics-frameworks-and-best-practices--VmlldzoxMTMxNjQ4NA
A Sprinklr Guide to Using NLP in Social Media Marketing, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.sprinklr.com/blog/nlp-in-social-media/
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) | WhyLabs, accessed March 29, 2025, https://whylabs.ai/learning-center/introduction-to-llms/evaluating-large-language-models-llms
The Rise of Large Language Models in Automatic Evaluation: Why We Still Need Humans in the Loop - Thomson Reuters, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/innovation/the-rise-of-large-language-models-in-automatic-evaluation-why-we-still-need-humans-in-the-loop/
Evaluating Large Language Models: Methods, Best Practices & Tools - Lakera AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.lakera.ai/blog/large-language-model-evaluation
LLM Bias: Understanding, Mitigating and Testing the Bias in Large Language Models, accessed March 29, 2025, https://academy.test.io/en/articles/9227500-llm-bias-understanding-mitigating-and-testing-the-bias-in-large-language-models
academy.test.io, accessed March 29, 2025, https://academy.test.io/en/articles/9227500-llm-bias-understanding-mitigating-and-testing-the-bias-in-large-language-models#:~:text=Researchers%20and%20practitioners%20have%20developed,procedures%2C%20and%20data%20augmentation%20techniques.
A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directions, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384363990_A_Comprehensive_Survey_of_Bias_in_LLMs_Current_Landscape_and_Future_Directions
LLMs Evaluation: Benchmarks, Challenges, and Future Trends - Prem AI, accessed March 29, 2025, https://blog.premai.io/llms-evaluation-benchmarks-challenges-and-future-trends/
Bias in Large Language Models—and Who Should Be Held Accountable, accessed March 29, 2025, https://law.stanford.edu/press/bias-in-large-language-models-and-who-should-be-held-accountable/
Uncovering Bias in Large Language Models - Deepchecks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://www.deepchecks.com/uncovering-bias-in-large-language-models/
NeurIPS Poster A Unified Debiasing Approach for Vision-Language Models across Modalities and Tasks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://neurips.cc/virtual/2024/poster/96884
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey - MIT Press Direct, accessed March 29, 2025, https://direct.mit.edu/coli/article/50/3/1097/121961/Bias-and-Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models-A
EditBias: Debiasing Stereotyped Language Models via Model Editing - OpenReview, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=_l6GYAi8fwl
A Unified Debiasing Approach for Vision-Language Models across Modalities and Tasks, accessed March 29, 2025, https://openreview.net/forum?id=181llen2gw&referrer=%5Bthe%20profile%20of%20Xiaoqian%20Wang%5D(%2Fprofile%3Fid%3D~Xiaoqian_Wang1)

From <https://gemini.google.com/app/> Google Gemini Deep Research

#3094 Google Gemini 2.0 Flash: Dumping the Contents of an LLM to Learn its Workings and Capabilities

Comprehensive Methodologies for Investigating the Inner Workings and Capabilities of Novel Large Language Models

1. Introduction: The Imperative of Understanding New LLMs

2. Laying the Groundwork: Initial Information Gathering

3. Direct Interaction and Output Analysis: Unveiling Capabilities

4. Identifying Limitations and Biases: Probing the Model's Underbelly

5. Contextualizing Performance: Comparative and Community Analysis

6. Advanced Methodologies for In-Depth Analysis

7. Navigating the Challenges and Ethical Considerations

8. Conclusion: Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of LLMs

Works cited

Decoding the Intelligence: A Comprehensive Analysis of Large Language Models

Core Functionalities and Task Handling

Text Generation and Manipulation

Question Answering and Information Retrieval

Text Summarization and Analysis

Language Translation and Multilingual Capabilities

Acting as a Specific Persona

Knowledge Acquisition and Representation

Training Data and Pre-training Process

Knowledge Cut-off Date

Internal Representation of Knowledge

Reasoning and Information Processing

Reasoning Process for Answering Questions

Explaining Complex Topics

Handling Contradictory Statements

Safety Protocols and Ethical Considerations

Response to Harmful Requests

Handling Information Outside Safety Guidelines

Adversarial Prompting and Vulnerabilities

Limitations and Biases

Limitations of Knowledge and Abilities

Biases Present in Responses

Evaluation and Transparency

Reasoning Process for Answering a Previous Question

Identification of Potential Biases

Transparency in Model Release and Documentation

Conclusion

Works cited

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

#2892 Example of ChatGPT o1 Prompt

#3105 Federal and State Spending Idiocy

#3102 Code Challenge: Database + LLM Chat GUI