#3180 Machine Learning for Correcting a Low-Budget Astronomical Mirror
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
#3180 Machine Learning for Correcting a Low-Budget Astronomical Mirror
#3180 I have a low-quality (i.e. cheap) 16-inch diameter mirror that I want to use for a Newtonian reflector telescope. How can I apply machine learning by using the mirror to image a square grid then compare that image to the original grid?
Below is a practical, end-to-end workflow that treats your inexpensive 16-inch mirror as a black-box optical element, measures the aberrations it introduces with a square-grid target, and then trains a machine-learning model that can either (a) numerically “clean up” every photograph you take through the telescope or (b) drive an active-optics polishing / deformation routine if you later add actuators.
1 Optical test bench
Item | Why | Tips |
---|---|---|
Back-illuminated square grid (e.g. an LCD tablet showing a black/white checker or a printed transparency on a light panel) | Provides thousands of precisely known feature points | Use a grid whose cell size is ≤3 mm so that many cells are visible at once. The target must be perfectly flat. |
Distance | Makes the rays effectively parallel, mimicking a star | ≥50 × focal-length (put it down a hallway or outdoors at night). |
Monochrome astrophotography camera at Newtonian focus | Captures distortions introduced by your mirror only (no Bayer artifacts) | Lock focus; record RAW frames. |
Stable mount & collimation | Ensures repeatability so ML sees only mirror-induced changes | Re-collimate after each mirror tweak. |
2 Data acquisition loop
-
Collect baseline frames
Capture 50–100 short-exposure images of the grid. Average or median-stack to kill sensor noise. -
Introduce controlled perturbations (optional)
If you plan to drive actuators later, deliberately tilt / slightly torque the mirror and collect new stacks.
These become labelled examples of “input → desired output”. -
Save metadata
Focal length, grid-to-mirror distance, temperature, any mirror adjustments.
Store it in a CSV/JSON sidecar for supervised learning later.
3 Computer-vision extraction of an “error map”
OpenCV gives you a deterministic pipeline that you’ll reuse inside the ML training script:
import cv2, numpy as np
img = cv2.imread("stacked_grid.tif", cv2.IMREAD_GRAYSCALE)
# find all black-white crossings
ret, thresh = cv2.threshold(img, 0, 255, cv2.THRESH_OTSU)
corners = cv2.goodFeaturesToTrack(thresh, maxCorners=4000,
qualityLevel=0.01, minDistance=8)
# sort the corners into a rectangular lattice
# … (hierarchical clustering / BFS) …
# fit an ideal square lattice by least squares
ideal_pts = fit_perfect_grid(corners) # (Nx2 array)
H, _ = cv2.findHomography(corners, ideal_pts)
# residual = actual – ideal ⇒ vector field of distortions
residuals = corners.squeeze() - (cv2.perspectiveTransform(
corners, H)).squeeze()
# build dense 2-D distortion map with radial-basis interpolation
dist_map = interpolate_to_full_frame(residuals, img.shape)
np.save("distortion_map.npy", dist_map)
Interpretation:
-
The x/y residual vector field is an image-space manifestation of your mirror’s slope errors.
-
Convert it to wavefront error by multiplying by focal length (small-angle approximation) if you want Zernike coefficients for classical optics analysis.
4 Machine-learning approaches
4.1 Image-space “de-warper” (fast post-processing)
Step | Details |
---|---|
Dataset | Input = distorted raw frame. Target = cv2.warpPerspective(input, H) (i.e. corrected grid). |
Model | A lightweight U-Net or residual CNN (PyTorch). Acts like an adaptive deconvolution / distortion compensator. |
Loss | L_total = L1(output, target) + λ⋅TV(output) to preserve edges. |
Augmentation | Random brightness, sensor noise, small rotations → robustness to field & seeing changes. |
Output | A .pt file you call in your astrophotography script: clean = model(raw_tensor).cpu().numpy() |
Edge benefit: you can train on synthetic stars too—render perfect Airy disks, warp them with the measured distortion_map
, and include them in training so the network learns to sharpen point sources, not just grids.
4.2 Wavefront-to-actuator regressor (active optics)
If you retrofit the mirror with a handful of push–pull screws or stepper-driven supports:
Step | Details |
---|---|
Labels | Record the actuator offsets A used for each grid capture. |
Features | Zernike coefficients Z or the raw distortion map flattened. |
Model | Small fully-connected network: A = f(Z) trained by MSE. |
Usage loop | ① Capture grid → ② Extract Z → ③ Predict actuator deltas → ④ Move mirror → ⑤ Repeat until residual RMS < goal. |
Because the mapping is smooth and low-dimensional (~15 Zernike terms ↔ up to 18 screws), you often need <500 labelled samples.
5 Putting it into practice
-
Prototype quickly: Run the OpenCV extraction once; inspect the heat-map with
matplotlib.imshow(dist_map[...,0])
to verify you’re seeing sane patterns (coma, astigmatism, trefoil…). -
Decide latency target:
-
Photographers: ≤1 s/frame is fine → use GPU inference on a laptop or Raspberry Pi 5 + NPU.
-
Real-time active optics: aim for <100 ms → quantize the network with ONNX Runtime.
-
-
Automate capture: Small script that slews between grid and sky so every observing session starts with a recalibration stack.
-
Monitor drift: Append each night’s distortion statistics to a CSV so you can tell whether the mirror is settling, warping with temperature, or the tube is flexing.
-
Iterate: The more varied examples (temps, focus offsets, mirror tweaks) you feed the model, the better it generalizes to real stars and nebulae.
6 Resources & code starters
Purpose | Library / paper / repo |
---|---|
Grid detection / homography | OpenCV (goodFeaturesToTrack , findHomography ) |
Thin‐plate spline warping | SciPy RBF or torchvision.transforms.TPS |
Fast CNN inference on small devices | ONNX Runtime / PyTorch Mobile |
Optical wavefront theory reference | Mahajan, “Optical Imaging & Aberrations, Vol. II” |
Example telescope-distortion ML pipeline | GitHub → AstroAI/distortion-unwarp (synthetic data + UNet) |
What if you skip ML?
A single least-squares fit of Zernike polynomials to the distortion map already tells you which aberrations dominate (e.g., 0.4 λ of third-order coma). You can then:
-
Refigure the mirror (classical polishing).
-
Insert a custom 3-D-printed corrector lens optimized in Zemax.
-
Live-stack with drizzle + deconvolution (e.g., AstroSurface) guided by the measured PSF.
ML doesn’t replace those optics fundamentals; it simply lets you reach parity with a far better mirror today, while you decide whether physical fixes are worthwhile.
7 Next steps checklist
-
□ Build/print a precise square grid and verify flatness.
-
□ Capture and stack baseline images through the 16" optics.
-
□ Run the OpenCV script to compute
distortion_map.npy
. -
□ Choose path 4.1 (post-processing) or 4.2 (active optics) and create a minimal PyTorch training loop.
-
□ Validate on a real nighttime star field; compare FWHM before/after correction.
-
□ Iterate with new data whenever temperature, collimation, or mirror support changes.
Good luck turning that budget mirror into a surprisingly sharp reflector!
From <https://chatgpt.com/> ChatGPT o3
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment