#3711 TRIZ Problem Categories and TRIZ Activities for Each

#3711 TRIZ Problem Categories and TRIZ Activities for Each

#3711 What are the categories of problems and tasks that TRIZ can handle?

TRIZ (a Russian acronym for "Theory of Inventive Problem Solving") is a powerful methodology for innovation and problem-solving that can be applied to a wide array of challenges. Developed by Genrich Altshuller, TRIZ is based on the idea that inventive principles are universal and can be systematically applied to solve problems. The categories of problems and tasks that TRIZ can handle range from simple technical issues to complex system-level challenges and even non-technical problems.

## Technical and Engineering Problems

At its core, TRIZ was developed through the analysis of patents and is therefore exceptionally well-suited for technical and engineering challenges. These problems are often characterized by contradictions, where improving one parameter negatively impacts another.

  • Improving Existing Products and Processes: This is a primary application of TRIZ. It helps engineers and designers enhance the performance, efficiency, and reliability of existing products and manufacturing processes. For example, making a car engine more powerful often increases its weight. TRIZ provides systematic ways to resolve such contradictions without trade-offs.

  • Developing New Products and Technologies: TRIZ is a valuable tool for conceptual design and the creation of next-generation products. It helps in identifying and overcoming the fundamental limitations of current technologies, leading to breakthrough innovations.

  • Solving Production and Manufacturing Issues: This includes troubleshooting production line problems, reducing defects, improving yield, and optimizing manufacturing processes. For instance, TRIZ can be used to find innovative ways to inspect products without slowing down production.

  • Failure Analysis and Prevention: By understanding the underlying principles of system evolution and failure, TRIZ can be used to anticipate and prevent potential failures in products and systems.

## Business and Management Problems

While its roots are in engineering, the principles of TRIZ have been successfully adapted to address a variety of business and management challenges.

  • Strategic Planning and Business Model Innovation: TRIZ can be used to identify and resolve strategic contradictions, such as the desire for both high quality and low cost, or the need for both standardization and customization. This can lead to the development of innovative business models and a sustainable competitive advantage.

  • Organizational and Process Improvement: TRIZ principles can be applied to streamline organizational structures, improve workflows, and resolve conflicts within teams or departments. For example, it can help in designing more efficient communication channels or resolving bottlenecks in a business process.

  • Marketing and Sales Challenges: The inventive principles of TRIZ can be used to develop creative marketing campaigns, overcome sales objections, and find new ways to reach and engage customers.

## Software and IT Problems

The abstract nature of TRIZ principles makes them applicable to the logical and systemic challenges found in software development and information technology.

  • System Architecture and Design: TRIZ can help in designing more robust and elegant software architectures by resolving contradictions between competing requirements, such as performance and security, or flexibility and simplicity.

  • Algorithm and Feature Development: When faced with a challenging algorithmic problem or a new feature that seems to introduce conflicts with existing functionality, TRIZ can provide a structured approach to finding an inventive solution.

## Social and Environmental Problems

The systematic problem-solving approach of TRIZ can also be applied to complex social and environmental issues.

  • Sustainable Development: TRIZ can be used to develop innovative solutions for environmental challenges, such as waste reduction, energy efficiency, and pollution control, by resolving the contradictions between economic development and environmental protection.

  • Addressing Social Needs: The principles of TRIZ can be used to devise creative solutions to social problems in areas like healthcare, education, and public services.

At the heart of TRIZ is the concept of identifying and resolving contradictions. The types of problems TRIZ can handle are often categorized by the nature of these contradictions:

  • Technical Contradictions: Occur when improving one characteristic of a system leads to the deterioration of another. For example, increasing the strength of a material might also increase its weight.

  • Physical Contradictions: Occur when a single element of a system has conflicting requirements. For example, a container needs to be hot on the inside to cook food but cool on the outside to be handled safely.

By providing a structured methodology and a toolkit of inventive principles, TRIZ empowers individuals and teams across various domains to move beyond conventional thinking and find truly innovative solutions to a wide spectrum of problems.


For a concise explanation of the TRIZ method, you might find this video helpful: The TRIZ Method Explained. This video provides a good overview of how inventors can use this problem-solving framework.


For each of the categories listed, provide the TRIZ activities that apply in the sequence they would be applied

Of course. Here are the typical sequences of TRIZ activities applied to each of the problem categories. While the core process is similar, the specific focus and terminology adapt to the domain.


## Technical and Engineering Problems ⚙️

This is the classic application area for TRIZ, and the process is well-defined.

  1. Define the System and Problem: Clearly identify the components of the engineering system and the specific unwanted effect or goal. For example, "A car's brake disc overheats during heavy use, reducing braking efficiency."

  2. Formulate the Contradiction: Identify the core conflict. This can be a Technical Contradiction (improving one thing worsens another) or a Physical Contradiction (one thing needs opposite properties).

    • Technical Example: Improving braking power (useful function) worsens heat dissipation (harmful function).

    • Physical Example: The brake disc must be hot to dissipate kinetic energy but must be cool to maintain material integrity.

  3. Use TRIZ Tools to Find Principles:

    • For a Technical Contradiction, use the Contradiction Matrix to map the improving and worsening engineering parameters to suggested Inventive Principles.

    • For a Physical Contradiction, directly apply the Separation Principles (e.g., separation in time, space, or upon condition).

  4. Generate Specific Solutions: Brainstorm concrete ideas based on the suggested principles. For example, if the principle of "Segmentation" is suggested, a solution might be to create slots or holes in the brake disc to increase surface area and airflow.

  5. Analyze and Select the Best Solution: Evaluate the generated ideas against constraints like cost, manufacturability, and performance to select the optimal solution.


## Business and Management Problems ๐Ÿ“ˆ

The process is adapted from engineering language to business terminology.

  1. Identify the Core Business Problem: State the problem in clear business terms. For example, "We need to expand our product line to attract new customers, but doing so increases operational complexity and costs."

  2. Formulate the Business Contradiction: Frame the problem as a conflict between two desired business outcomes.

    • Contradiction: We want to increase Product Variety (improving feature) but this worsens Operational Simplicity and Cost-Effectiveness (worsening features).

  3. Adapt TRIZ Principles: Translate the 40 Inventive Principles into a business context. For instance, "Segmentation" could mean creating modular business units or offering customized service packages.

  4. Generate Strategic Solutions: Use the adapted principles to brainstorm solutions. Applying "Segmentation" could lead to creating a spin-off brand for a niche market or developing a core platform with customizable add-on modules instead of entirely new products.

  5. Develop an Implementation Plan: Evaluate the potential solutions based on market impact, resource requirements, and strategic fit, then create a plan for implementation.


## Software and IT Problems ๐Ÿ’ป

Here, the focus is on logical systems, requirements, and architecture rather than physical objects.

  1. Define the System and User Story: Clearly articulate the software's function and the specific problem or conflicting requirement. For example, "The application needs robust, multi-layered security, but this makes the user login process slow and cumbersome."

  2. Identify the Logical Contradiction: Define the conflict in terms of system attributes or user experience.

    • Contradiction: Improving Security (useful attribute) worsens Usability/Speed (harmful attribute).

    • Physical Contradiction Example: A user's session must be both "authenticated" (secure) and "uninterrupted" (usable).

  3. Apply Principles to Architecture/Design: Use the 40 Inventive Principles to find conceptual solutions.

    • The principle of "Taking Out" might suggest removing the traditional password step entirely.

    • The principle of "Prior Action" (or pre-loading) might suggest performing security checks in the background before the user needs access.

  4. Generate Code-Level or Architectural Solutions: Translate the concepts into concrete technical solutions. For example, implementing biometric authentication (fingerprint/face ID) or using secure tokens that authenticate a session seamlessly in the background.

  5. Prototype and Test: Build a prototype of the proposed solution and test it for both security effectiveness and user experience to validate the approach.


## Social and Environmental Problems ๐ŸŒ

This application is broader, focusing on complex systems with multiple stakeholders.

  1. Map the System and Stakeholders: Identify all components of the problem, including people, organizations, resources, and policies. For example, "We need to reduce plastic waste, but consumers demand the convenience of single-use packaging."

  2. Formulate the System-Level Contradiction: Define the core conflict between societal needs, economic drivers, and environmental goals.

    • Contradiction: Improving Consumer Convenience leads to worsening Environmental Pollution.

  3. Use TRIZ Principles for Policy/System Innovation: Apply the principles at a high level to inspire new models or interventions.

    • The principle of "Nesting" (matryoshka doll) could inspire a system where packaging is returned and nested for efficient transport back to a facility.

    • The principle of "Changing the Color" (or changing properties) could suggest developing packaging that visibly degrades or changes color when it's no longer safe, adding a new function to it.

  4. Generate Intervention Strategies: Brainstorm specific policies, technologies, or social programs. This could range from creating a new type of biodegradable material to designing a city-wide reusable container program with convenient drop-off points.

  5. Model and Pilot the Solution: Analyze the potential impacts of the proposed solution on all stakeholders and run a pilot program in a limited area to test its effectiveness and identify unintended consequences before a large-scale rollout.


What about Ideal Final Result and Functional Analysis?

Of course. Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Functional Analysis are foundational concepts in TRIZ that are used at the beginning of the problem-solving process to define the problem with precision and set a clear direction for the solution.

They work together to ensure you are solving the right problem and aiming for a truly innovative solution.


## Functional Analysis: Mapping the Problem ๐Ÿ—บ️

Functional Analysis is a technique used to model a system and understand how its components interact. The goal is to identify the root of the problem, not just the symptoms. You break the system down into its parts and analyze the function of each part.

Functions are categorized as:

  • Useful: The intended, positive actions of a component.

  • Harmful: Undesired, negative side effects.

  • Insufficient: Useful actions that don't perform to the required level.

By mapping these functions, you can pinpoint the specific components and interactions that are causing the problem. This often reveals that the initial problem statement was focused on a symptom, while the real issue lies elsewhere in the system.


## Ideal Final Result (IFR): Defining the Perfect Solution ๐ŸŽฏ

The Ideal Final Result (IFR) is a formulation of the ultimate solution, completely free of constraints and contradictions. It's a guiding star for your problem-solving efforts. The IFR is typically stated in a way that implies the problem solves itself.

The core principle is: "The desired result is achieved without adding new complexity or introducing new problems."

Key characteristics of an IFR statement:

  • It eliminates the original harmful action.

  • It preserves the useful actions of the system.

  • It uses existing resources within the system or its immediate environment.

For example, if the problem is that a chair's legs scratch the floor, the IFR would not be "put felt pads on the legs." Instead, it would be: "The floor is not scratched, and the chair performs its function at no extra cost or complexity." An even more ideal statement is: "The chair itself prevents the floor from being scratched." This forces you to think differently, perhaps about the material of the chair legs or the nature of the floor, rather than just adding a corrective component.


## How They Fit into the Process

Functional Analysis and IFR are typically used at the very beginning of the TRIZ process. Here is how the previously discussed sequences are enhanced by including them:

Technical/Engineering Problems ⚙️

  1. Perform Functional Analysis: Model the entire system (e.g., the car's braking system), identifying every component (disc, caliper, pads) and their interactions (useful, harmful, insufficient). This will precisely locate the source of the overheating.

  2. Formulate the Ideal Final Result (IFR): State the ideal solution. For instance, "The kinetic energy is converted to heat and dissipated by itself without the brake disc's temperature rising to a harmful level."

  3. Identify and Formulate the Contradiction: Based on the IFR, pinpoint the core contradiction. (e.g., The disc must have high friction to brake but low friction to avoid heat buildup).

  4. Use TRIZ Tools to Find Principles.

  5. Generate Specific Solutions.

  6. Analyze and Select the Best Solution.

Business/Management Problems ๐Ÿ“ˆ

  1. Perform Functional Analysis: Map the business process or system, identifying all stakeholders, departments, and resources as "components." Analyze their functions (e.g., Sales team has a useful function of generating leads but a harmful function of setting unrealistic expectations for the delivery team).

  2. Formulate the IFR: Define the ideal business outcome. For example, "Customer expectations are met automatically as part of the sales process, without needing a separate reconciliation step."

  3. Identify the Business Contradiction.

  4. Adapt TRIZ Principles.

  5. Generate Strategic Solutions.

  6. Develop an Implementation Plan.

Software/IT Problems ๐Ÿ’ป

  1. Perform Functional Analysis: Model the software architecture, including modules, databases, user interfaces, and APIs. Analyze their functions (e.g., An encryption module has a useful function of securing data but an insufficient function because it slows down system performance).

  2. Formulate the IFR: State the ideal system behavior. For instance, "The data is completely secure by itself without impacting user-perceived speed."

  3. Identify the Logical Contradiction.

  4. Apply Principles to Architecture/Design.

  5. Generate Code-Level or Architectural Solutions.

  6. Prototype and Test.

Social/Environmental Problems ๐ŸŒ

  1. Perform Functional Analysis: Map the entire socio-ecological system. Identify all actors (companies, consumers, government), resources (materials, energy), and interactions (economic transactions, pollution, regulations).

  2. Formulate the IFR: Define the ideal state for the system. For example, "Packaging provides its function of protecting goods and then disappears without leaving a trace or requiring any effort from the consumer."

  3. Identify the System-Level Contradiction.

  4. Use TRIZ Principles for Policy/System Innovation.

  5. Generate Intervention Strategies.

  6. Model and Pilot the Solution.


How could Mathematica along with Wolfram LLM Tool Kit enable TRIZ analysis for problem solving?

Unleashing Inventive Problem-Solving: How Mathematica and the Wolfram LLM Toolkit Can Revolutionize TRIZ Analysis

The powerful combination of Wolfram Mathematica's computational prowess and the Wolfram LLM Toolkit's natural language processing capabilities can significantly enhance and streamline the application of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ), a systematic methodology for innovation. This synergy offers a robust framework for defining complex problems, navigating vast solution spaces, and ultimately, fostering breakthrough inventions.

At its core, TRIZ provides a structured approach to problem-solving by identifying and resolving contradictions. By leveraging a vast knowledge base of inventive principles and patterns of technological evolution, TRIZ guides innovators toward non-obvious solutions. The integration of Mathematica and the Wolfram LLM Toolkit can amplify each stage of this process, from initial problem formulation to the generation and evaluation of inventive concepts.


Phase 1: Problem Formulation and Analysis with the Wolfram LLM Toolkit

The initial and arguably most critical phase of TRIZ involves a deep and precise understanding of the problem. This is where the natural language processing capabilities of the Wolfram LLM Toolkit prove invaluable.

A key aspect of TRIZ is the translation of a specific, real-world problem into a generalized, abstract problem. The LLM Toolkit can be instrumental in this process. By feeding a detailed, narrative description of the problem into a custom-trained LLM, users can:

  • Identify Core Contradictions: The LLM can be prompted to analyze the text and pinpoint the inherent contradictions, both technical (where improving one parameter worsens another) and physical (where a system component has contradictory requirements). For example, a prompt could be: "Analyze the following problem description of a new aircraft design and identify the primary technical contradictions related to strength and weight."

  • Extract Key Parameters: The toolkit can help in identifying the 39 standard TRIZ engineering parameters that are relevant to the problem. This is crucial for utilizing the TRIZ Contradiction Matrix. A user could ask, "Based on this description of a manufacturing process issue, what are the most relevant improving and worsening parameters from the standard TRIZ list?"

  • Perform Function and Cause-Effect Analysis: By processing the problem statement, the LLM can assist in constructing a functional model of the system, identifying useful and harmful functions. It can also help in building a cause-and-effect chain to uncover the root causes of the problem.

Phase 2: Building and Interacting with a Dynamic TRIZ Knowledge Base in Mathematica

Once the problem is clearly defined, the next step in TRIZ is to tap into its extensive knowledge base of inventive principles and solutions. Mathematica's symbolic and computational capabilities provide the perfect environment for creating and interacting with a dynamic and intelligent TRIZ knowledge base.

This knowledge base would be more than just a static collection of information. It could be a structured, computable dataset of:

  • The 40 Inventive Principles: Each principle can be represented as a symbolic object in Mathematica, complete with detailed descriptions, examples, and even associated visual aids.

  • The Contradiction Matrix: This can be implemented as a dynamic matrix in Mathematica. Once the improving and worsening parameters are identified (with the help of the LLM Toolkit), Mathematica can automatically look up the corresponding inventive principles from the matrix.

  • Substance-Field (Su-Field) Analysis Models: The elements of a Su-Field model (substances and fields) can be represented symbolically in Mathematica. This allows for the programmatic construction and manipulation of these models to identify incomplete or harmful interactions and suggest standard solutions.

  • Patterns of Technological Evolution: These patterns can be encoded as rules and algorithms within Mathematica, enabling the exploration of potential future development trajectories for a given system.

Phase 3: Generating and Evaluating Inventive Solutions

The synergy between the LLM Toolkit and the Mathematica-based knowledge base truly shines in the solution generation phase.

  • Brainstorming with TRIZ Principles: The LLM Toolkit, when provided with the identified inventive principles from the Mathematica knowledge base, can generate a wide range of potential solutions. For instance, a prompt could be: "Given the contradiction between the 'strength of an object' and its 'weight,' and the suggested inventive principles of 'Segmentation,' 'Composite Materials,' and 'Asymmetry,' brainstorm five innovative design concepts for a lightweight yet strong bicycle frame."

  • Symbolic Modeling and Simulation: The generated concepts can then be translated into symbolic models within Mathematica. This allows for preliminary analysis and simulation to evaluate the feasibility and potential effectiveness of each solution without the need for physical prototypes. For example, a proposed solution involving a new material composition could be modeled to estimate its mechanical properties.

  • Automated Trimming and Simplification: TRIZ's "Trimming" technique, which involves removing system components while preserving their function, can be guided by Mathematica's analytical capabilities. By representing the system's functional model symbolically, it's possible to identify and evaluate potential candidates for trimming.

A Practical Workflow Example:

  1. Problem Definition: An engineer describes a problem with a wind turbine blade that needs to be both strong to withstand high winds and lightweight to improve efficiency. This natural language description is fed into the Wolfram LLM Toolkit.

  2. Contradiction Identification: The LLM identifies the core technical contradiction: Improving Strength leads to a Worsening of Weight of a moving object.

  3. Knowledge Base Query: These parameters are passed to the Mathematica-based TRIZ knowledge base, which queries the Contradiction Matrix.

  4. Principle Suggestion: Mathematica returns a set of inventive principles, such as Segmentation, Composite Materials, and Nested Doll.

  5. Solution Generation: The LLM Toolkit takes these principles and generates several conceptual solutions, including a blade with a segmented internal structure, a blade made from a novel composite material with a foam core, and a nested blade design for variable wind conditions.

  6. Modeling and Evaluation: The engineer then uses Mathematica to create simplified symbolic models of the most promising designs to analyze their structural integrity and weight characteristics.

The integration of Mathematica and the Wolfram LLM Toolkit has the potential to transform TRIZ analysis from a specialized, often manual process into a more accessible, dynamic, and powerful engine for innovation. By combining human ingenuity with the computational intelligence of these tools, the path to inventive problem-solving becomes clearer and more efficient.


This video provides a helpful overview of the TRIZ methodology, which can be a great starting point for understanding the concepts discussed. An Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving


From <https://gemini.google.com/app/>  Google Gemini 2.5 Pro


Personal Note: TRIZAgents.com and AgentsOfTRIZ.com are available

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

#2892 Example of ChatGPT o1 Prompt

#3105 Federal and State Spending Idiocy