#3991 New Paradigms in Computing

#3991 Given Quantum Computing and Probabilistic Computing as new paradigms on their way to wide use sometime in the future, what other paradigms of optimized computing are in-work?

While quantum and probabilistic computing capture most of the headlines, several other paradigms are being developed to bypass the "Von Neumann bottleneck" and the impending end of Moore’s Law. In 2025, these technologies are moving from pure academic theory into early commercial hardware.

Here are the key "optimized" computing paradigms currently in work:

1. Neuromorphic Computing (Brain-Inspired)

Instead of the standard CPU/RAM split, neuromorphic systems mimic the architecture of the human brain. They use SNNs (Spiking Neural Networks) where "neurons" only fire when they receive a specific signal, making them incredibly energy-efficient.

The Optimization: It eliminates the constant data movement between processor and memory.
Key Players: Intel (Loihi 2), IBM (TrueNorth), and startups like SynSense.
Status (2025): Currently being integrated into edge AI devices, drones, and "smart" sensors where milliwatt power consumption is critical.

2. Optical (Photonic) Computing

Rather than moving electrons through copper or silicon, optical computers use photons (light) to perform calculations. Since photons don't generate heat through resistance and can travel at the speed of light, these systems are theoretically much faster and cooler.

The Optimization: Extreme bandwidth and near-zero heat generation during calculation.
Key Players: Lightmatter, Lightelligence, and Ayar Labs.
Status (2025): Moving into data centers as "photonic accelerators" specifically for LLM inference and matrix multiplication, which light can perform almost instantly using diffraction and interference patterns.

3. Reversible Computing

In standard digital logic, when you erase a bit (e.g., an AND gate taking two inputs and producing one output), that "lost" information is dissipated as heat (Landauer's Principle). Reversible computing uses logic gates that never lose information; every operation can be run backward to recover the input.

The Optimization: Theoretically allows for computing with zero energy dissipation, effectively ending the "heat wall" in chip design.
Key Players: Vaire Computing (launched a prototype in 2025), Sandia National Laboratories.
Status (2025): The first "adiabatic" reversible chips are entering early testing for extreme-scale supercomputing and ultra-low-power edge devices.

4. Biological & DNA Computing

This paradigm uses biological molecules—specifically DNA and enzymes—to store and process data. Because DNA is 3D and incredibly dense, a single gram of DNA can theoretically store 215 petabytes of data.

The Optimization: Massive density and "embarrassingly parallel" processing (trillions of chemical reactions happening simultaneously).
Status (2025): DNA is primarily used for "Cold Storage" (archiving data for 1,000+ years), but researchers have successfully demonstrated DNA-based logic gates for "wetware" computing in medical diagnostics.

5. Analog Computing (Resurgence)

Old-school analog is making a comeback because AI doesn't always need 64-bit precision; it needs speed. Analog chips use varying voltages to represent a range of values rather than just 0 or 1, allowing them to solve differential equations or neural network weights in a single step.

The Optimization: Native support for continuous variables and "In-Memory Computing."
Key Players: Mythic, Rain Neuromorphics, and IBM.
Status (2025): Highly active in the "AI at the Edge" market, where analog-to-digital conversion is skipped to save power in devices like smartwatches and industrial robots.

Comparison Summary (2025 Outlook)

Paradigm	Primary Benefit	Best Use Case
Neuromorphic	Power Efficiency	Robotics, Edge AI, Sensors
Optical	Latency / Speed	LLM Training, Data Centers
Reversible	Zero Heat Waste	Future Supercomputers
Biological	Storage Density	Long-term Archiving, Biotech
Analog	Efficiency / Math	Real-time AI, Signal Processing

Would you like me to dive deeper into any of these, perhaps looking at the specific programming languages or hardware architectures (like memristors) being used to build them?

List in order of low-budget solopreneur feasibility

For a low-budget solopreneur in 2025, the barrier to entry isn't just the price of the silicon—it’s the accessibility of the software toolchain and the ability to prototype without a clean room or a billion-dollar fab.

Based on your background in S&MA and your current toolkit (laser engraver, 3D scanner, Python expertise), here is the ranking of these paradigms by solopreneur feasibility.

1. Analog Computing (The "Resurgence")

Feasibility: Very High

Analog is the most accessible because you can build it on your desk today. While IBM and startups like Mythic are making high-end "Analog AI" chips, the fundamental principles of using voltages to solve differential equations are classic EE.

The Solopreneur Angle: You can prototype analog "neurons" using off-the-shelf op-amps and resistors. For a software veteran, the challenge is shifting from discrete logic to continuous signals.
Low Budget: Costs less than $50 in components to start.
Next Step for You: Look into "In-Memory Computing" (IMC) concepts using memristor emulators or standard analog circuits to accelerate specific matrix operations for your Python applications.

2. Neuromorphic Computing (Spiking Neural Networks)

Feasibility: High

This is the closest "next-gen" paradigm to being a consumer product. Companies like BrainChip now sell PCIe cards and Raspberry Pi "hats" (the Akida platform) that allow you to run Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) locally.

The Solopreneur Angle: You don't need to build the chip; you just need to learn the libraries. Python libraries like snntorch and Nengo allow you to simulate neuromorphic logic on your existing GPU before committing to hardware.
Low Budget: A developer kit (like the Akida Shuttle PC or PCIe card) runs between $500–$1,000—a bit steep, but within "prosumer" solopreneur range.
NASA Tie-in: Neuromorphic chips are ideal for S&MA in space because they are radiation-tolerant (due to simplicity) and consume milliwatts of power.

3. Optical / Diffractive Computing

Feasibility: Moderate (with your specific tools)

Usually, this is high-budget (Lightmatter, etc.), but for someone with a laser engraver and an interest in diffraction patterns, this becomes a "maker" project.

The Solopreneur Angle: You can experiment with Diffractive Deep Neural Networks ( $D^2NN$ ). These use physical layers (like your stacked acrylic sheets) with 3D-printed or laser-etched patterns to "calculate" light interference. The "calculation" happens at the speed of light as the laser passes through the sheets.
Low Budget: Cost of acrylic, a laser diode, and a cheap CMOS camera (to "read" the output).
Status: You are essentially building a passive optical computer that performs image recognition or Fourier transforms for the cost of craft supplies.

4. Reversible Computing

Feasibility: Low

While the logic is fascinating (computing without generating heat), the hardware is not yet "off-the-shelf."

The Solopreneur Angle: This is currently a software-only playground for you. You can write reversible logic gates in Python to explore how algorithms would work if they never "erased" a bit.
Low Budget: Free (simulation only).
Hardware Status: Startups like Vaire Computing are just beginning to tape out the first general-purpose reversible chips in 2025. You likely won't have a dev kit on your desk for another 2–3 years.

5. Biological / DNA Computing

Feasibility: Lowest

Unless you want to convert your Iowa farming roots into a synthetic biology "wet lab," this is out of reach for a solopreneur.

The Solopreneur Angle: You can act as a "data architect" for DNA storage. Companies like Twist Bioscience offer services to encode digital data into DNA.
Low Budget: High. Synthesis and sequencing costs are still prohibitive for a "low-budget" operation unless you are just buying a few kilobytes of "digital DNA" as a novelty.

Summary Table for 2025 Planning

Paradigm	Entry Path	Solopreneur Cost	Skill Transition
Analog	Breadboards / Op-amps	< $100	Digital → Continuous
Neuromorphic	Akida / Loihi Cloud	$500+	CNN → SNN (Spiking)
Optical	Laser-etched Acrylic	$100 - $300	Code → Wave Physics
Reversible	Simulation / Python	Free	Standard → Reversible Logic
Biological	Third-party Services	$1,000+	Software → Bioinformatics

Since you are already exploring stacked acrylic and laser etching, would you like me to find some recent 2025 research papers on "Passive Diffractive Neural Networks" that you could prototype with your current engraver?

Yes

Research into Passive Diffractive Neural Networks (D2NN) has exploded in 2024–2025, specifically moving away from high-end lithography toward "robust" designs that can be built with accessible tools like yours.

Given your toolkit (laser engraver, acrylic, Python), here is how you can prototype a "Passive Optical Computer" today.

1. The Core Research: "Vaccinated" D2NNs (2024)

Recent papers from groups like UCLA and others have introduced v-D2NNs (Vaccinated Diffractive Neural Networks).

The Problem: Standard optical computers are extremely sensitive. If a layer is off by a fraction of a millimeter, the calculation fails.
The 2024 Breakthrough: Researchers now train these networks using "Vaccination" strategies—essentially adding random noise and displacement variables into the Python training model.
Why this matters for you: This makes the network robust enough to be fabricated with a commercial laser engraver rather than a clean-room lithography machine. It "expects" your laser’s tolerances and your acrylic's thickness variations.

2. Software: The Python Simulator

To design your layers, you need to simulate how light diffracts through them. You don't need to write the physics from scratch.

Diffractsim (GitHub): A high-performance Python library using JAX. It is differentiable, meaning you can use standard AI training (like PyTorch) to "evolve" the patterns you need to engrave.
Angular Spectrum Method: Use this specific algorithm (built into these libraries) to model the light propagation from your laser source through your stacked acrylic sheets.

3. Practical Fabrication: Your Solopreneur Strategy

Since you have a laser engraver and acrylic, you can build a Phase-Only or Complex-Valued D2NN.

Step A: Depth Mapping (The "Phase" Layer)

Standard laser engraving on cast acrylic creates a "frosting" effect. By varying the Power and Speed in your LightBurn (or similar) settings, you change the etch depth.

The Math: Light travels slower through acrylic than air. By etching to different depths, you vary the time it takes for light to pass through that "pixel," effectively shifting its phase.
Calibration: Run a "Power Scale" test on your acrylic. Use a digital micrometer to measure the depth of each square. This gives you a Python look-up table: Target_Phase -> Laser_Power.

Step B: Stacking the Layers

Laser Source: Use a cheap 635nm (Red) or 532nm (Green) laser diode module (~$15).
Input Mask: Your first sheet of acrylic is the "Input." Your laser engraver etches the image/data you want to process onto it.
Hidden Layers: Stack 3–5 sheets of acrylic, each etched with the "weights" your Python model calculated.
Detector: Use a Raspberry Pi Camera or a cheap CMOS sensor. The "answer" to your calculation is where the light focuses on the sensor (e.g., if light hits the top-left corner, the answer is "Digit 0").

4. Why this fits your "Solopreneur" niche

Zero Latency: Once your sheets are stacked, the calculation happens at the speed of light.
Passive Energy: The computer itself uses zero watts. Only the light source and the camera need power.
S&MA Application: You can prototype "smart lenses" for NASA-style sensors that can perform edge-detection or object recognition before the data even reaches a digital chip—drastically reducing the radiation-sensitive electronics needed in space.

Recommended GitHub Repos to Clone:

rafael-fuente/diffractsim: The best library for visualizing and optimizing your diffractive patterns.
tutuna/Diffractive-Deep-Neural-Networks: A reproduction of the original UCLA Science paper code in Python/Jupyter.

Would you like me to draft a Python snippet that demonstrates how to map a 2D array (your neural weights) into a grayscale image ready for your laser engraver?

Yes

To start building your own Passive Diffractive Neural Network (D2NN), your first task is to translate the "brain" (the trained weight matrix) into a physical "bone" (the etched acrylic).

In a D2NN, each "neuron" is a tiny area on your acrylic sheet that shifts the phase of the light. We achieve this shift by varying the thickness of the acrylic through laser engraving.

1. The Physics: Mapping Phase to Depth

To create a specific phase shift $\phi$ , you need to remove a precise depth of material $\Delta d$ . The formula for the required etch depth is:

\Delta d = \frac{\phi \cdot \lambda}{2\pi (n_{material} - n_{air})}

lambda: Wavelength of your laser (e.g., 635nm for red).
n: Refractive index (approx. 1.49 for cast acrylic).
phi: Phase shift in radians (typically optimized between $0$ and $2\pi$ ).

For a full $2\pi$ shift at 635nm, you only need to etch about 1.3 micrometers deep. Since most hobbyist lasers have a minimum depth much deeper than this, you will likely work with "multi-order" phase shifts or use the laser's power-to-depth curve to find your most stable range.

2. Python Snippet: Array to Engraving Map

This script takes a 2D array of weights (optimized phase values) and converts them into a 16-bit grayscale PNG. Using 16-bit is crucial for solopreneurs because it provides 65,535 levels of depth, preventing "stair-stepping" in your optical calculations.

import numpy as np
from PIL import Image

def generate_diffraction_layer(weights, filename="layer_1.png"):
    """
    Converts a 2D array of phase weights (0 to 2pi) into a 
    grayscale image for laser engraving.
    """
    # 1. Normalize weights to 0.0 - 1.0 range (if they aren't already)
    # We map 0 -> 2pi phase to 0.0 -> 1.0
    normalized_weights = (weights % (2 * np.pi)) / (2 * np.pi)
    
    # 2. Convert to 16-bit integer range (0 to 65535)
    # This ensures high precision for the laser's power modulation
    uint16_weights = (normalized_weights * 65535).astype(np.uint16)
    
    # 3. Create image using 'I;16' mode (16-bit unsigned integer)
    img = Image.fromarray(uint16_weights, mode='I;16')
    
    # 4. Save as PNG (which supports 16-bit)
    img.save(filename)
    print(f"Layer saved as {filename}. Resolution: {weights.shape}")

# Example: Create a 500x500 random phase mask
random_weights = np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, (500, 500))
generate_diffraction_layer(random_weights)

3. Laser Strategy: The "Grayscale" Mode

When you import this image into your laser software (like LightBurn), ensure you use the following settings:

Image Mode: "Grayscale" (not Dither or Jarvis).
Min/Max Power: You must calibrate these. Usually, "Min Power" is set just high enough to mark the acrylic, and "Max Power" is set to reach your target depth for a $2\pi$ shift.
Scanning Offset: Since you are a software veteran, don't forget to calibrate your backlash compensation (Scanning Offset Adjustment). Even a 0.1mm jitter will ruin the interference pattern.

Your Next Step

Before you engrave a full neural network, you need a Calibration Step-Wedge.

Would you like me to generate a Python script that creates a "Power-to-Depth" calibration grid? You can engrave this on a scrap piece of acrylic and measure it with a micrometer to find your laser's exact linear response range.

Build a DIY Diffractive Optical Element

This video provides practical insights into aligning and troubleshooting common mechanical issues with laser engravers that can affect the precision needed for optical computing projects.

Yes

Since you are working with a laser engraver and acrylic, your "passive computer" relies on the depth of the etch to shift the phase of light. Because a $2\pi$ phase shift in acrylic (refractive index $\approx 1.49$ ) at visible wavelengths (e.g., $635\text{nm}$ ) requires a depth of only about $1.3\text{ \mu m}$ , you need a way to correlate your laser’s power/speed settings to actual physical depth.

1. The Calibration Strategy

We will create a Step-Wedge grid. Each square in the grid will have a slightly different grayscale value (mapped to laser power). After engraving, you can use your Revopoint MIRACO or a digital micrometer to measure the depth of each square.

2. Python Script: Calibration Grid Generator

This script generates a 16-bit PNG. Each row represents a "Power" level, and each column represents a "Speed" level (if your software supports multi-layer mapping) or simply a linear progression of 256 grayscale levels.

import numpy as np
import cv2

def create_calibration_grid(rows=16, cols=16, square_size=100):
    """
    Generates a 16-bit grayscale grid for laser depth calibration.
    Total levels = rows * cols (e.g., 256 levels).
    """
    # Create an empty canvas
    canvas_w, canvas_h = cols * square_size, rows * square_size
    grid = np.zeros((canvas_h, canvas_w), dtype=np.uint16)
    
    # Calculate the step value for each square
    total_squares = rows * cols
    step = 65535 // total_squares
    
    for r in range(rows):
        for c in range(cols):
            # Calculate grayscale value for this square
            val = (r * cols + c) * step
            
            # Draw the square
            y, x = r * square_size, c * square_size
            grid[y:y+square_size, x:x+square_size] = val
            
            # Optional: Add a small border to distinguish squares
            grid[y:y+5, x:x+square_size] = 0 # Top border
            grid[y:y+square_size, x:x+5] = 0 # Left border

    # Save as 16-bit PNG
    cv2.imwrite("laser_calibration_grid.png", grid)
    print("Calibration grid saved as laser_calibration_grid.png")

create_calibration_grid()

3. How to use this for S&MA / Optical RAG

Once you have your measurements, you will have a Transfer Function (e.g., Grayscale Value 32768 -> 0.65µm depth). In your Python logic:

Input: Your NASA requirements (as a bitmapped pattern).
Logic: Apply your "Optical Weights" (etched into your acrylic).
Result: The camera reads the diffraction pattern, and you use a simple Python script to interpret that light pattern as a "Match" or "No Match" against your S&MA standards.

4. Pro-Tip for your MIRACO 3D Scanner

Since $1.3\text{ \mu m}$ is near the limit of consumer 3D scanners, you can use a "Slope method":

Instead of measuring the absolute depth of a flat square, engrave a ramp (gradient).
Use your scanner to measure the slope of the ramp.
This makes it easier to find the "linear region" where your laser power and acrylic depth are most consistent.

Comparison of Fabrication Approaches

Method	Resolution	Precision	Equipment
Dithering	Low	Low	Any Diode Laser
8-bit Grayscale	Medium	256 Levels	Basic CNC/Laser
16-bit Grayscale	High	65,535 Levels	High-end Controller
Direct Lithography	Ultra-High	Atomic Level	Research Fab

Would you like me to show you how to write the "Detector" script in Python that uses a webcam to interpret the resulting diffraction pattern from your acrylic layers?

Photo Engraving on Slate with a Diode Laser

This video is relevant because it demonstrates how to establish your laser's dynamic range using a grayscale test grid, which is essential for calibrating the depth needed for your diffractive optical computing layers.

From <https://gemini.google.com/app/> Google Gemini 3.0 Pro (Thinking)

Search This Blog

Learning from ChatGPT